7
*
data point we evtained by suvtracting the Flatheal exposure.
3.6 SHOT RAYA
See Tables 3.10, 3.11, anf 3.12.
Some ghenomenca, perhaps the shock,
eaused all of the quarte-fiber Gosineters in the rate devices te artivate
at om early time.
As a result, they yielded enly total exposure data.
Station 211.01 we partially blowm eut ef the gromd. The rate device
414 net drop, ts the station yielded enly total exposure information.
The l-minute drop timers wese corroded anf @id not function.
Conseq-
wently, the estinates of residual exposure en Sites Bog anf Easy are
not accurate.
3.7 SHOT TEWA
Table 3.13 gives Tewe instrumentation and recevery data, end Table-{
3.14 shows residual exposure data.
Bate from the Chariie-Dog reef,
ineluiing scattered initial gavee data is listed in fable 3.15,
Yotel gamma exposures at Statiods }15.03 and 113.09 are well estedlished,
Residual exposure estinates were obtained from Stations 115.02
an4é 113.03,
These stations were in the same general area anf hal the
seme goonctry anf recevery rates, wut they were in a region where the
initial gamma exposures vere negligible. Filz at Stations 118.04, 113.07,
anf. 113.08 reed greater than 70,000 r. The chemical data at 113.04
appearsvalid. The chemical data at 113.08 is probably in errer, since
it contradicts beth the film data at 113.08 and the chextcel date at
113.04, end ie far below the predicted level. _,me exporures saticipated
at Station 113.07 were far abeve the useful range of the cjemical
Gosineters and 1% is prebeble that they saturated, anf thet the actual