evaluation of decontamination techniques; reflected in the Table 58. Anti-Aircraft Artillery and Guided Missile Texas. the exposures were high, as (AA&GM) Center, Ft. Bliss, Three men from this unit were badged with TG 7.1. probably personnel on temporary duty for radsafe TG 7.1 recruited from Ft. Bliss ment). No other (TU 7). They were During 1953 (Reference 8, September 1953 Install- activity has been associated with these men. Ballistic Research Laboratories, Aberdeen, Maryland. 930lst Test Support Unit (Ordnance) Projects 1.2b and 1.8. BRL, supported by the at Aberdeen Proving Ground, staffed A total of 18 BRL and 930lst TSU personnel are shown in the Consolidated List of CASTLE Radiological Exposures (Ref- erence 13) but only 10 are identified with the projects by name. posures for two exceeded 3.9 R. Ex- Four of the military were Air Force enlisted men, not soldiers, and their exposures are listed in Table 86 under non-Air-Force organizations in TG 7.1. The exposures for the Army personnel and the civilians from BRL and the 930lst are shown combined under BRL in Table 58. Corps of Engineers, Washington, D.C. One civilian participant in Project 6.5, Decontamination and Protection, was exposed to 2.275 R. Military District of Washington, Hq. One officer participated with NRL in Project 2.3 making neutron measurements. Signal Corps Engineering Laboratories Monmouth, New Jersey. His exposure was 2.7 R. (and Evans Signal Laboratory), Ft. Eight civilians and eight military participated in Projects 2.1 and 2.2 in gamma dosimetry and in Projects 6.6, 7.1, and 7.2 in electromagnetic effects. offsite participation; The latter two projects involved the exposures of the civilian associated with Project 6.6 was 0.200 R. The gamma dosimetry projects involved instru- ment recovery in contaminated areas; 3.9 R. 328 four persons were exposed to over