The rationale for table Ta le as fillows:
The total effective tiolorical
dose that would be received if evaciat.>° were not ordered is obviously a
determining factor
Another tonsiderat >- ts the fact that suc: an action
@s evacuatio= es:]4A ve davwercus to tie Oiivicuals and could also possibly
be detrimental to a rery necessary om'! al effort of weapons development.
One gust trec ag, “Sst how ame)
wvacuotion?®
ow!
eo gn nec fradiation dose saved) by
Fetimates of these two wa-ts: les are indicated in table Ia,
Thua, @ populace mar receive up tc # ca > lated 3roentgen effective biological
@ose in one year with indicat( yg
evacnetion
evacuatio: would be a. sidered onl
f° 4:
"rom 30 to 50 roentgens,
*
{
least 15 roentgens could be saved
ty sven action,
ad at SO roentgecs or
without regard tof o* coag, le wav ga
To
omakiog a rout
mmer suc’
. raclatic
astirate of a
theoretical marteus "7 nity ganna
dose,
«oo doses, one war calculate @
‘cw a ¢
as "7" for an estiv-ate of
way be satisfacstc
‘cher evacuation would be indicated
“el ariitrarily divide by some
4 se actvalls received,
Frereas this
#s ie forst acoros -.’' > 7c, 8 more realistic estizete should
tLe made, espec all. we
ceall g wie
t aen * ot nto t constitute a bealt
haserd,
Ine to the seceass(’: 07 sakiog €6°
to be expected tha’ (icasrate reac
availatle evidence a
gn,
pesstre sits and decisions, it is
taxe with
tie times of comer
considered {> esti wand
a
effet re
Tavle Tb surmarises the parancters
Jtoct cal cose based on dose—rate
readings,
a
survey meters, will be t:e
Sire