C (2) on? We should make a definite recommendation that the Commission proceed to solve the Midwest situation in the direction of budget- ing a machine for the Argonne National Laboratory. (3) We cannot clearly recommend the MIT-Harvard proposal as yet. is in essence no different from the MURA proposal. It Its approval at this time would give MURA ground for pressing its own proposal, which would interfere with the Argonne. Action should be delayed until a policy is formulated and until some decision is made with respect to MURA, fal present assented to this way of commenting on the accelerator proposals, (Appendix B, item 3.) Next, ways of wording the citation of the award to Enrico Fermi Fermi were discussed, It was agreed to give the Commission several drafts Me Sitewordings for théir selection. (Secretary's Note: Three suggested wordings were given to Dr. Libby, as follows: (1) "For his contributions to basic neutron physics which led to the achievement of the controlled nuclear chain reaction." (2) "For his pioneer researches in nuclear physics, particularly those relating to neutrons, and for his brilliant leadership of the work that led to the achievement of the first sustained nuclear chain reaction," (3) | "For his pioneer researches in basic neutron physics, and for his especially meritorious contribution to the achievement of the first sustained nuclear chain reaction.") -_————_ Gaerne , Q, bry rf