C
(2)
on?
We should make a definite recommendation that the Commission
proceed to solve the Midwest situation in the direction of budget-
ing a machine for the Argonne National Laboratory.
(3)
We cannot clearly recommend the MIT-Harvard proposal as yet.
is in essence no different from the MURA proposal.
It
Its approval
at this time would give MURA ground for pressing its own proposal,
which would interfere with the Argonne.
Action should be delayed
until a policy is formulated and until some decision is made with
respect to MURA,
fal present assented to this way of commenting on the accelerator
proposals,
(Appendix B, item 3.)
Next, ways of wording the citation of the award to Enrico Fermi
Fermi
were discussed,
It was agreed to give the Commission several drafts
Me
Sitewordings for théir selection.
(Secretary's Note:
Three
suggested wordings were given to Dr. Libby, as follows:
(1)
"For his contributions to basic neutron physics which led
to the achievement of the controlled nuclear chain reaction."
(2)
"For his pioneer researches in nuclear physics, particularly
those relating to neutrons, and for his brilliant leadership of the
work that led to the achievement of the first sustained nuclear chain
reaction,"
(3)
|
"For his pioneer researches in basic neutron physics, and
for his especially meritorious contribution to the achievement of the
first sustained nuclear chain reaction.")
-_————_
Gaerne
,
Q,
bry
rf