The present system could
quality and LET;

in principle obviate

the

need t

ftfLeld quantities; a “Standard radiation”,

c2diatioa

linear “dose

effect” and “dose response” relationship; ciskx coefticients; 3254;
equivalent and cem.
accurately

Che

The problem of

cadfatiton tield

difficult, whether one uses

ovtataine meusurements that cepresenut

in tissues and cell populations

the current SE or

is

sf course

the proposed £5 approaches.

A rather far-reaching conclusion is nossidle with

the vroposed

Each relevant organ system in the body contains enormous auabers

of cell alements.
possible,

With

the proposed approach embracing

with any exposure,

individuals have approximately
in principle,

«>

we thea

for a given exposure, a population of individuals

these numbers can

transformea cells.

With a graded series of

then be correlated with cancer ftucidence,

which can be evaluated only long after the exposure,

beings.

e

Assuming all exposed noraal

the same number of relevant cells,

with known and equal numbers of
exposures,

-

to estisate the (fractional) nunber sof

transformed cells in the individual.
can have,

tne NSEr,

ye

approach.

dose

in aninals cr in heaan

The result would be a function for cancer risk as a function of

the number of

transformed cells inthe individual,to reolace the

currest

organ dose-cancer incidence function.
The significance of
system,
cancer

the above is perhaps

one can derive only a quite uncertain estimate
from a

physical

quantity,

and

equivalent in very large populations
individual.

individual,
obtained.

one must

use

the

to evaluate the

of

in the preseat
the risx of

collective

lose

risk of cancer in te

On the other hand, with the proposed system, one has a neasure

of actual effeccr,

vs.

substantial.

i.e.,

the fraction of quantally responains celis,

from which the cancer risk tailored to that individual can te
In other words,

the function for the probability of an eftect

the amount of exposure may in princisle be by-passed completely.

one has

in the

in principle removed

the evaluation of

Thus

risk from the realm of Ph in

which the focus is offictally Limited to the health of the populacion or
society,
health of

and placed it in the Md category,
the individual person.

buc in the medical,

social ana legal

With respect to the probab{liry of causation (

1?

SOG 14 bb

focus is oa the

This may have many iuaplications, not only

in radiation biology and protection,
spheres as vell.,

in which the

), it

Select target paragraph3