ws = > to the Office of the Flight Surgeon, TG 7.4, on 17 March, MARSHALLING On 5 March a critique of the aircraft marshalling plen for the first mission, was received from the WRECEP>” ‘Tho deficiencies encountered in the marshalling of Test Services Untt aircraft wore pointed out, and recommendations made to effcct a smoother operation, At a meet- ing with TG 7.4 this plan was discussed and later adopted for use on "ROMEO" and subsequent missions, PROJECT PARTICIPANTS - wo eene ee ee eee eee ce An information eopy of a Programming Plan published by Headquarters, TG 7.4, was received by this headquarters on 6 March2? The plan outlined the implementation required to meet, greet, and show Project Participants the scope of the GASTLE activity, MATS terminal personnel were advised by this headquarters of their responsibility of advising the Adjutant, Headquarters, TG 7.4, prior to arrival of inbound Project Participants (VIPts). PRE-POSITIONING OF AIRCRAFT The possibility that westerly surface wind conditions might exist at this station during mission take-offs for test operations, prompted this hcadquarters to solicit ideas regarding the pro-positioning of aircraft on mission days. Tho WRECEP submitted recommendations covoring east and west take-offs to this headquarters on 9 March 1954. This head- quarters concurred in the proposals, and forwarded them to Headquarters, TG 7.4, recommending they ba approved=* wuuHo 22. WRECEE Ltr Subj "Critique of Acft Marshalling Plan", dtd 5 Mar 54 TAB #18) 23. Hq TC 7.4 Programming Plan 2-54, dtd 6 Mar 54 (TAB #19) «24e_:s«C#H,:«STSUP Ltr Subj "Pre-Positioning of Acft", dtd 10 Mar 54 (TAB #20) 455