a er mem foe Mr. Cutler contirueé mis briefing Py expliaicing the and recommendations of the NSC Planning Boarc or she sotone D-Minus which the Boar hac been requested tc sonsice- commerts of Plan qe pointed out that the Budget Bireau ~epresentative cn the “lannin, Soard hac expressed concern as *c tne validity of the -asua.t: “t.cires “tetaling 50,000,000) which were set forth in paragrap:. * “wre OA of Part I of the Plan. “he 3t.ge* Member had pedintes ci" “iain i hese sasualty figures were no’ s.ppocted or a curvernt ites 0 Tae Net Evaluation Subcommitte« The Preside: t again interrupted te gay “het ing of the validity o° she casualty @igures of getting into "a numbers same’. coir question. ‘liustrete i the dangers The President suggested that in- gtead of over-a.] tas.ait. “igures, Plan D-Minus sheul: assume certain classification o «areer cf sssuaity and damace wee word te related to the target: sategories of areas. w.: he ‘e,res of camage 9° if: “Fears Mr. Cutler epwie.. ty stating that the 'Lanris., Soard hac deemed the 50,000,00C casue.t}) 7liamre as reagonabie o: the light of past reports by the Net Pve..uatior Subcommittee Me “Lanning Boar further felt that some suct cver-412 casualty @Pieure: ~- necessar for planning purposes Pur exampie, one has te lpr cre amber estimated availabie ..s;) “6 (‘teas Ha such caguglt: to pees ' Mr. Catier ‘mer c.agec oom Mr. Gray to epee. ° Snde ome ini Mr. Gray replied that the Furea. ..f the Bucget was pro aanuy otgeht Yo one could actuall. prove that cmder suck » surprose cack we would have 50.90," wasualt‘es in “he nite some kind of estimate war evsenisl for the purposes cleur et- ~ Fate: ~~ But ‘ederal civil Defense Administratic: and ���heir rehabilitatic: sinandi: s. Perhaps this sould be jen-, ag th President suggester. >. terms of areas related t targ ts within trem. Since th» ow “Laure wa not very useful. Mr. ora, s:ic that the pret oer o 1) + tar. ned the light of the Pres gers” suggestion.