Yroject 10.1 - Fince4.LhL HYDRODYI-IGCS - J. Mullaney
HK. Hoerlin
Tae hydrodynemic yield {PLETED: ccterined on the basis of three
Zastnan filzs each from photo stations at Farry, at the southern tip of Runit
and from Piiaarai,.
Three different methods of data reduction were employed, all of which are
based on equation 17 of Chapter 5, by Bethe, in LA-1021, which states that the
yield is sproportional to the mass of the air engulfed, and the square off
shock velocity,
The Bsthe-Fuchs rass~cormection terns were Included,
nny
More s:;ecifically, the first nethod, as eaployed by Joe Mulléney uses
squeation 17 and the riss-correcticn tern in en intecsrated form,
The propeitton-
ly Pacter vas checen to give ¢sgveivent
with the "older vis -rclArG?.- CteoC
chealeal ylelds.
The resulting data are shcwn in colucn 2 of Table 10,1-1
The second method, as enployed by Roy Blumberg, determines the yield fron
equation
17 on a point by point basis, also with mass-ccerrection.
‘.
The velocitics
3ye derived graphically fron the ROG radiue-tine cata and the f( 0-1) function
For
data see colucn 3
fs
‘ras obteincd from KING shot, tesiing S10 KT as its yield,
rinally, the Mech-nunbder sasling cethed vas used by Roy Alunvserg in a siviter
fashion as curing Ts: FOT, however, applying also r2ss-correction,
The basic 1 kT
MNach-nuzber relation used is one worked out by D. Seacord and Tod Snyder utilizing
if! problem M and CASTLE data,
See data in colucn 4 of Table 10,1-1 (Mach
-~ 44
——)
_»
ot
vm
Sealing).