”
tiis was calculated to give gust response of apprer h
O-E5 percent c- zisn
limit on the wings.
d early and 10 feet
to left of course at T o?
errival,.
2.
Altitude
was 15,190 feet,
Parley - The planned position of Barley was on an in-bound heading of
C50°T with a horizontal offset of 22,200 fcet left of ground zero,
fest abreast of ground zero at H # 19 seconds.
3.25 se conds
to be 15,100
Actual posit ion on shot day was
early and 640 feet left of course at Ty 1.15 seconds carly aml 430
feet to left of course at shock arrival, altitude was 10,180 feet,
PESULTS.
ee
1.
There was no apparent aircraft or instrunentation danzse to ene eine
aaa
vat.
2.
Deta obtained:
a.
Weiter
received an eyrip.zcsure of 9,2 vst,
“tived for the positioning yield.
pircent of desicn limit.
tuition of wing fuel is
‘the critical wing bends‘rg
A refined value will te
detercined,
.7.
Since alurtrun
°s 1,0 psi
we
.vailable when the
skin tempsiatues
vis y.t-
aS Jay 20
coach «
idcrs
-l-
2
of prinary importance in this shot, it was not reduced as priority data in the
Field.
b
“arley was deprived of cLtaining 50 percent of its deta Cre to
cls
vieording speed of one of its two 5O-chanrel cscillozrephs being set et one inch
rer second.
This miss~setting csused the traces to be jursbled up to the
Lat deta reduction was virtually isypecsible.,
iss-settings such as this in the future.
- 50-
Sisps
e.tsnt
have been tzehksn to pir. cat