_ > 49} Demobilization BLOGs 34 NOV 79 DESCRIPTION rTrrTry BUILDINGS |LAUNDRY BOILER 565 |POL OFFICE 642 683 |H & N STORAGE ft DEC 79 rrr Ty JAN 80 eer tr FEB 80 rreve rt MAR 80 APR 80 Ieebereebnnt ewedeeaberen. Terry vr Tt ~ = VEH/EQUIP MAINT A/C PKG APRON as REMQVE HAZARDS | NS | 31 191 LAUNDROMATI(EQUIP) bees BUNKER REMOVE DES6RIS my | OTHER REHAB PIER FINAL POLICE SO. IS. REHAB MEDREN PIER MEDREN CLEANUP STAKE RUNIT RUNIT CLEANUP EQUIP CLEANING ML realeLemclamel Ts do ebeeabamrebnen bel Srebaradneck FIGURE 9-4. ARMY TASKS (ANNEX Y). was reviewed in detail. Several tasks were identified which could be accomplished by the USAE rather than by one of the contractors. In keeping with the intent of Congress to minimize costs by using troop labor, these tasks were reassigned to the USAE (Figure 9-5). ~ One major unfinished task was the removal of the hangar, Building 118, which had been damaged by typhoons and nowconstituted a potential hazard. It was agreed that HRN-PTD would dismantle the highest portion of the building, which required skills not available in the USAE, while the USAE would complete the dismantling and removal of the hangar. The work began on 19 November 1979 and, by the end of the week, 95 percent of the aluminum sheeting had been removedandstockpiled for use by the dri-Enewetak.47 By 15 December 1979, in a period of 4 weeks, the huge hangar had been completely dismantled, the metal stockpiled or disposed of in the lagoon, and the concrete pad ripped up and used as beach and shoreline protection. That same week, the last one of the fuel storage tanks which were not to remain for the people also was removed.48 On 10 December 1979, an all-agency conference was held in Albuquerque to revise demobilization plans based on the accelerated L progress being made by the JTG. Several issues with the potential to impact on the momentum of the demobilization effort were discussed. A major tropical storm could strike in the closing days and cause damage