Planning and Programming

89

uncertainty of maintaining the controls necessary to reach those reduced

bone 5: Same cleanup as Case 3 plus removal of over 700,000 cubic
ards of soil from other islands; disposal of contaminated debris and soil
ocean dumping, replacement of soil from scraped areas with imported

soil; and use of all islands with no restrictions as indicated in the 1973

Master Plan. This case was rejected because of the uncertainty that it
would actually reduce exposures and because it was inordinately

expensive. 10

The preferred Case 3 combined Cleanup Action I] and Habitation Plan
C and permitted reasonable use ofthe entire atoll (Figure 2-5). Not all

reviewers agreed with the selection of Case 3 as the optimum case or even
that it was an acceptable case. Some AECofficials argued strongly for the

cleanup of Enjebi and further study of the Runit cleanup problem. Mostof
those involved, however, believed that Case 3 provided a practical basis

for cleanup, rehabilitation, and resettlement.

LTG Johnson personally presented copies of the DEIS to the Enewetak

people and their attorney, Mr. T. R. Mitchell, at a high-level meeting on
Enewetak on 7 September 1974. Other attendees included: Mr. StanleyS.

Carpenter, Director, Office of Territorial Affairs, DOI; Mr. William Rowe,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, EPA; Mr. Peter T. Coleman, Deputy
High Commissioner, TTPI, Messrs. Martin Biles, William W. Burr, Jr.,

and Mahlon E. Gates, of AEC; RADM Swanson, Brigadier General
Wesley E. Peel, USA, POD Engineer; Mr. Earl Gilmore, H&N; and Mr.

Amata Kabua, then Senator in the Congress of Micronesia and
subsequently President of the Marshall Islands. Representatives from the
Marshalls District Legislature and the Bikini Atoll Council also
participated. Motion pictures and illustrated briefings covering nuclear
testing, the Radiological Survey, the Engineering Survey, the Master Plan,
and the DEIJS were presented in both English and Marshallese to the over

100 dri-Enewetak who attended.!°7 The Government’s plans were

generally well received by the people; however, they had misgivings about

some aspects, particularly not being able to live on Enjebi, the plan for onatoll disposal of radiological contamination, and the possibility that Runit

might not be cleaned enoughto preclude the need for quarantine.!98 Upon

his return to Washington, LTG Johnson was forced to send the people

more discouraging news: Congress had again denied funds to begin

cleanup in FY 1975 on the grounds that insufficient planning had been

completed to permit a firm estimate of overall cost.!09,110

During the conference, it had been agreed that some 50 dri-Enewetak,

including the Planning Council, should return to the atoll early and live on
Japtan during the cleanup project to consult and advise on cleanup and
rehabilitation problems. The early return was contingent on Congress

Select target paragraph3