81 Planning and Programming There were 12 possible combinations of cleanup actions an rehabilitation plans. Some were found to be incompatible, and others wer rejected for basic deficiencies. Of those remaining, a matrix wa constructed (Figure 2-3) to show a reasonable range of alternatives. Fiv: representative combinations were chosen for detailed analysis of dos: reduction, health effects, cost, and general acceptability. The five case: (shown in Figure 2-3) are described briefly as follows: Case I: No cleanup; useofall islands without restriction as indicatedir the 1973 Master Plan. This case was rejected as it would expose the people to all of the radiological and physical hazards existing in the atoll. Case 2: No radiological cleanup; removal of physical hazards and obstructions to use on the southern islands, Jinedrol (Alvin) through Kidrenen (Keith); residence on the southern islands only; use of fooc grown on only southernislands. This case was rejected as it did not permi eventual use of the northernislands. Case 3: Removal of hazardous and obstructive scrap from all islands anc removal of an estimated 79,000 cubic yards of plutonium concentration: from Boken, Lujor, Aomon, and Runit (Figure 2-4); disposal o contaminated debris and soil by one of several options including crate: containment; residence on southernislands only; use only coconuts fron northern islands. (Enjebi was regarded as a special case by the AEC Tas} Group, and Case 3 did not include removal of plutonium concentrations ir Hatreanion Mans a All tehande used in apnerdence with Enowauh Monet Man Cleanup Actions 1, Ne deanup. 8 ‘Live on Eniehi und sewtherw islands; ven (aed grows on Enjebl; use pandenus ang Desedirun grawn enty in farming phate on Enjebs or ¢c Live an southern ielende; vee ‘anty secon from nethern ielende 6 Live on southere telende; ute toed grown on enly teuthert itands lporwnd te Uniebt Coen 1 AEC Option 1° Ht, Removal ot horardews and Conn AEC Ontion 1! Cane & settruatine neereteeninn AEC Option tv sarap, and rebbeaative tereg| trom ut iehends, Removal ef Pu eaneanerotions from Com 3 AEC Opeion tit tows inionae,* 11, dnveneite sheanup of retkdanan end seeders stone. Con 6 Aparonimetely ALC Cotion ¥ oor ete “ “Rapert by the AEC Test Group on Ressmmondations tor Clesnup nnd Rehabilitation of Enowetak,” dune 19, 1674, » cose 2 citters from ether programs in Rew } by removal af pivysieal hanerd and obetruseive debris extagories of redinemive and nenredinnstive serap on sauthers lands, © Pusenlum eonentretion retes to burieh grounds and sed dispersions of seneaniretion in excets of 46 pCiip. Areet of tell canepatretion in sxeet of 400 pCilg showid be remaved withawt question; areas of tell enaaeneration berenen 40 wed 400 pCi/g should be eonsitered of an individual beni. 4 nernevel of aif veren trem: oft reskdenen intone specitioN in tach eshvenn and remeral of spesitie smote ot toil ia spesitie oreus 06 achieve sutornel andl ienernal deans ne greueer then would be sheartnd trom netically euburring tauvent. FIGURE 2-3. ALTERNATIVE CLEANUP AND HABITATION PROGRAMS.