Loa: 80-038 RBRG”uanH =. Gh HW EHH a Olle eeltCCf PROPOSAL REVIEW WORKSHEET (To be used only as a toc] in the review process; not to be construed as a final determination of OES action) Originator: Nevada — VU of Lost Title: DOES III] Type: 189 ENEWETAK FISH TAGGING AND MONITORING Proposal No: Funding Requested: FY 1978 Operating: $35,000 Equipment: Lead AD: — 000 ADFO FY 1979 $70 ,000 000 FY 1980 $75,000 000 Control No: 600165 B&R No: GK-01-01-08- 4 . + AD Recommendation (Summarize documentation of initial review): A. Recommended - Indicate Funding Level, Branch, and O&S Project Officer: B. Not recommended - reason: Reviewed by: Project Officer Assistant Director Reviewer Checklist (Not allproposals will require consideration of al} of the followinc, but the reviewer shculd consider the applicabiiity of each item below): 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Responsiveness to the Annual Call. Applicability to OES programs. Continuity of OES programs. Peer review. Suitability of proposer.