Loa:
80-038
RBRG”uanH
=.
Gh
HW
EHH
a
Olle
eeltCCf
PROPOSAL REVIEW WORKSHEET
(To be used only as a toc] in the review process; not to be
construed as a final determination of OES action)
Originator:
Nevada — VU of Lost
Title:
DOES III]
Type:
189
ENEWETAK FISH TAGGING AND MONITORING
Proposal No:
Funding Requested:
FY 1978
Operating:
$35,000
Equipment:
Lead AD:
—
000
ADFO
FY 1979
$70 ,000
000
FY 1980
$75,000
000
Control No: 600165
B&R No:
GK-01-01-08- 4
. +
AD Recommendation (Summarize documentation of initial review):
A.
Recommended - Indicate Funding Level, Branch, and O&S Project Officer:
B.
Not recommended - reason:
Reviewed by:
Project Officer
Assistant Director
Reviewer Checklist (Not allproposals will require consideration of al}
of the followinc, but the reviewer shculd consider the applicabiiity of
each item below):
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Responsiveness to the Annual Call.
Applicability to OES programs.
Continuity of OES programs.
Peer review.
Suitability of proposer.