t * at os ae Bor ~, ei, a. oko ‘ rt 2 amareee “yet. i—_ Foant i “GHGRBE?F of ty eo)a rye a On two separate occasions in Sub-C ommittee (useussior, Soviet delegate Malik played up the need for an unconditional ban or tne iste nuclear weapons in terms deliberateiy discounting the ‘nreat of Sovre’ retaiiite June 3, rs he indicated that the Soviet formula of adherencete tre yttucK (on ‘O25 Genev. Protocol banning gas and germ warfare which reserved the rirmt of retalia‘ion was no longer adequate; and on June 8 he asserted that the TISSR wouid not use nuclear weapons even if attacked, but would rely on the General Assembly to find that the state first using nuciear weapons was a war criurinal In line with Moscow's long-standing stress on the moral force ofa "reciaration” and the decisive character of public opinion ir the event of war, Malik ciaimec tna’ the whole worla would thereafter r:se against such 4 war criminal. The Western statement of willingness t ban the use of nuclear weapons except in cas- of "defense against aggressior, :ncorporated in the France-Fritish draft program of stages, may have Deen 3 factor encouraging tne ['SSR to play down the possibility of retaliation. Mati rejected the Western proposition as a "legitimization" of the use of nuciesr weapons, and tnere nas een au public Soviet reference to the propos:] attention from it. ee sw eee @ te @ @ eae pase see ee #e wt ea Pe we heh eee ee we eseee epuwes ohe ep eee et ee wetter weet ees ee ee wea tenn eee we we eee e& oe siggesting Moscow shoves se vena we sae @ ee wee aes i ee eee ep se epee a F ee ee es He ree ew eenewuaauanaean oe @PeeveatBeuve eh How ee ee . Le ee ees . wee eee eee be os ee . 7 * - Fe eb ee = ef oe ew 7 sen he e+ . . . ad - -_ oo4 he so. ee =! * . . - eR 8 . # we Be wee eee eee eee eae ee 8B © ese @ etnrteeaestteene tree oe es eseweh®aesen eee@m@aesee *teep ete@*e Pee eee tee ete er es se see se 6 er ete ep ee ere we eh ete ewe eee eR wea we ew e er ee eee eee @ etme @ es we ewe ee ee GS ee 8 we oe . Cd * eke ee =» aree ee se ewe ee tee ee id ere oe 8 . oo . . ow a r + oo s - . * aoe ° a * . ee eo 7 * 2. oa oJ * ee ee em ee * ae wo * ee a8 8 . r+ . * wh ee tea na ae “ + ee ef fee . cow ee ee oa twee + soe . wos ee ee com oe soe e woe * ee 4 oe eT a oon . ee . HH * es -o® 2 & bh rn oe a an ee - ee cy eon ee ee * wm ee se ee Rm oe o# a ee lee eee wee zee 4 et hh ke ee @etensnsveeeeeweneeee ee ele lhe /_/-— > er ell he em ee ee wee Hwee wae ee rhUmrhhUhhUhhhUrhUhrhUhM eee eesevrv eae Pee © 4 . etme *¢ . o* # . eee ae Dp be wees . [a eo@ # « CJ *-.s. ee ae - “ oe ee 8 . . pe eee ee eee we eee eee eae 8 me a . bee er to. * #@ 4 wo aoa ee a cserting dom non «mw e oe FP e oo . bow * . Ce - . . oom * . . . - © . Pe ee ee wore se 8 em ert + soe ee sn 2 8 * ee . ‘ « me F moe . Pe * 7 ot rr eeu Dae e eee wee e eee eee eee the SOVie’ note of July 3 24 ertec porn edly aL asGp evi¢ dence of the danger of war the existence of ‘guided rockets wit! atara:e charvwes. , imeomparably more destructive than the flying |'V" bombs wii: amen the doomed Hitlerites... sought to cestrcy some world famous centers of -ulture On the other hand, Navy Dev articles adopted the mor: gerers.. ce aporoack used prior to last Decemberof stressineg Sc viet prepai enunes-~ aR ee me RECA SUN ERLW EDD bl ar sree 4b wi Ua JU repulse’ anyattack. fe PTV Ly , Tests in the Marshall Islanas The Trusteestup Coune, sereeste dain i a Soviet resolution urging the US to desist from noiding nucieu: cess on tne Trust territory of the Marshall Isiands’’ as a violation of tte ctorgacions of Trustee and urging compensation and restitution of janis‘ tre ensure its freedom of action, th: USSR resirieted its resco ution tests strictly in the trust territory, based iis obtections or iar: denied the utilty of an Indian reso.ution asking the Internationa. Justice to pass on the legality of hoiding nuctear tesig naccus) (presumably to avoid focussing attention on mis veneru is: + SER tnmabitants. 7 ° a ban on cA egal tTrounds, © ourt of ee ritery TST ana