17

cous membranes from improperly prepared arrow-.

Tabie i1

root flour is not uncommon. Both haveerroneously

been associated with radiation effects in the minds

Mortality, Utirik

of the Rongelap people.

(Av. age at death: 6123)

Diabetes mellitus is a major problem andis dis-

cussed separately in Section III. G.

A program is under wayto build newdispensaries on the outerislands. On Ebeye a new hospital building has provided improved conditions for
health care.

It is against this general backgroundthat our
examinations take place. We are privileged to get
generous help from the local health authorities in

our task, and conversely when weare on the scene

we cannotavoid getting involved in problems outside the scope of fallout complications.

Major physical findings during the past 5 years
are listed in Table 8.
B. VITAL STATISTICS: FERTILITY AND MORTALITY

The numberoflive births during thelast 5-year
period was 37 amongthe exposed and 69 among the
unexposed. Calculated as live births per year per
1000 population these numbers give a birthrate of
112 for the exposed and 106 for the unexposed. In
addition, there were 10 miscarriages among the
exposed and 18 among the unexposed,so that, in
both groups, one pregnancyoutoffive ended in
miscarriage. This is approximately the samefre-

quency as observedin the past (see Table 9).

Legal abortions are not performed in the Mar-

shail Islands, and there is no reason to believe that
any of the pregnancy terminations on record were

provoked. Family planning has not been practiced

in the past althoughit is slowly gaining ground.
We therefore believe that the fertility and fetus
viability indicated by these statistics are the natural ones, and, although the exposed females showed

an apparent increase in miscarriages during the

first 5 years, there is no evidence suggesting that
the history of exposure to radiation has had any
permanenteffect on either.
The peopie who havedied arelisted by year in
Table 10, with their age and probable cause of
death (such death certificates as are available are
not always specific). The overall mortality rate for

the 20-year period is ~12 per 1000 per yearfor
the exposed Rongelap group and ~ 13 for the unexposed; for the last 5-year period the rates are
~9 and ~21 respectively. These differences are
notstatistically significant; in such small groups

IO0CbIT4

Year

Subject
No.

Age
& sex

1956
1957
1957
1957
1958
1959
1959
1959
1959
1960
1960
1960
1961
1961
1963
1964
1964
1964
1965
1965

2118
2184
2219
2222
2243
2122
2127
2170
2187
2116
2131
2180
2177
2199
2203
2163
2190
2192
2121
2154

24M
63 M
57 F
63 F
50 M
87 M
73M
46M
61 F
27F.
35 F
76 M
LLM
49 F
71F
75M
85 F
84F
68M
31 F

Year

Subject
No.

Age
& sex

1965
1965
1965
1965
1967
1967
1967
1968
1968
1968
1968
1969
1969
1970
i970
1971
1971
1972
1972
1973
1974

2183
2204
2238
2253
2181
2202
2223
2101
2112
2141
2259
2191
2214
2175
2211
2258
2246
2178
2252
2186
2201

67 M
71F
65 F
36M
78M
72F
79F
62 M
70M
67 F
36 F
90 F
80 M
73M
63 M
64 M
25 F
37M
357M
67 F
68 F

observed over such short periods, differences this
large or larger could occur by chance ( p<.0.05).

Even so, had the trend been in the opposite direction, we would have had reason to be concerned;

as an example, we are keeping a careful watch on the
apparent increase in malignancies (see Section V).
The mortality rate among the exposed Uurik
people was ~ 13 for the 20-year period and ~14
for the last 5 years. The deaths arelisted in Table
11, but causes are not given because ofinsufficient

data.
Recent misconceptions make it necessary to

clarify comparisons with district-wide statistics.

The vital statistics of the Trust Territory have improved greatly over the 20 years covered by these

reports, but they are still not published in sufficient detail to permit valid comparisons with ours.
‘The age distributions are too different: districtwide the median age is 16 years, whereas in our
groupit is between 30 and 40. The difference between the mortality in the general population (~7
per 1000 per year) and that in our groups (~ 13)
reflects this difference in age distribution andis

not related to the history of exposure. A similar ef-

fect can be seen on the birthrate ( ~+40 per 1000
per year district-wide and ~110 in our groups).

Select target paragraph3