Table 2 Estimation of Gamma Dose? No. Group designation t. Rongelap II. Ailingnae ITl. Rongerik IV. Utirik commencement 64 H+4to6hr 18 28 H+4to6hr H+6.8 hr group _ Approx. time of in 157 offallout H+22hr Best estimate used in dose of total gamma 375 mR/hr, H+7 days 175 H+58 hr H+ 28.5 hr (8 men) 100 mR/hr, H +9 days 280 mR/hr, H +9 days 69 78 Started at H+55 hr 40 mR/hr, H+8 days l4 evacuation H +50 hr (16 people) H-+51 hr (48 people) H+ 34 hr (20 men) Completed at H+ 78 hr and the fallout duration as ~ 12 hr, with most of the dose delivered early in that period. The times when people were evacuated from theislands are shown in Table 2. 2. Gamma (Whole-8ody) Dose The fallout (where seen) resembled snow or mist and was deposited relatively homogeneously so that the individuals on each island were con- sidered to have received about the same estimated dose of gamma radiation. The children may have had a somewhathigher dose than that calculated for the adults because, being smaller, they were closer to the ground andreceived larger midline doses. This possibility is supported by the higher incidence of early nausea and vomiting and the greater depression of blood elements in the young children. The flimsy houses afforded little attenu- ation of the radiation. The whole-body doses were calculated from measurements with radiationfield survey instruments held 3 ft above the ground, made within a week after the detonation, bv ex- trapolation to the time of exposure with the energy spectrum and decay taken into consideration. Table 2 shows the calculated gammadoses for the different populations exposed. The degree of hematological depression that developed later is consistent with the doses calculated. [n view of the 47 geometry of exposure, the midline doses to individuals were higher than those obtained with the usual bilateral exposure of x-radiation.? 3. Skin Dose The dose to the skin surface was much greater than the whole-body gammadose becauseof the large amountof beta radiation absorbed bythe skin. The actual skin doses, although impossible to calculate, probably amounted to thousands ofrads, OCR O8 Instrumentreadings Timeof calculations dose in air (R) and their range of values, due to different amounts of fallout sticking to different areas, accounted for the spotty nature and varying intensity of lesions. The extensiveness of the beta burns in each island group correlated roughly with the amountoffail- out visible on their island (see Table 6). Most of the skin dose was dueto fallout deposited directly on the skin, but some was due to beta radiation from fallout on the ground (estimated at Rongelap to be 2000 rads at the level of the dorsum of the feet, 600 rads at hip level, and 300 rads at the head, on the basis of continuous exposure and no shielding).? It was fortunate that the beta radiation had an average energy insufficient to penctrate deeply into the skin and therefore resulted for the most part in superficial beta burns. The average beta particle probably did not penetrate much beyondthe basal layer of the skin (~~ 100 y). However,since epilation occurred in many people, the region of the hairfollicles must have received a dose equivalentat least to the minimal epilating dose of 400 rads of 200-kVp x rays. 4. Internal Dose Caiculations Internal absorption of radioisotopes was due to inhalation as the radioactive cloud passed over and to ingestion of food and water contaminated with fallout, water probably being a majorsource. Drinking wateris obtained by collecting rainfall from the roofs into catchments, anda slight rain was reported on Rongelap the nightof the fallout. Since the cisterns were nearly empty, the dilution effect was minimal. Water was being rationed at that time, and it was drunk in spite of warnings from the health aide. On Rongertk food and water were better protected from fallout deposition. Internal levels of radioisotopes absorbed from: the fallout were assessed by numerous radiochemi-