IIl. Translations
.
me,
ion will,
nallése
{
on Sage
What:
iunds - no significant
translation o°
objectives is needed
Set for: the criteria for the selection of an approach:
Farform.ic2or results
As iv Options A and B.
As in Options A and B,
Total _.st
“As in Opecions A and B.
See column IV.
— How: for discussion of costs.
Who:
As in Options A and B. —pls all patients, exposed
operation with existing
to iow level radiation wie have
already gone through BNL ;
Flexibility
As in Uprions A and B - Increasing flexibiiity due to
status of Bikini and Eniwetok
aiid manpower) - permits better scheduling.
screening procedure - again
.
will change requirements.
Avoidance«= untoward consequences
,
we
When:
ee!
‘aa a
How:
Bog:
a te
fo
a
:
Ais
;
4°
4;
‘
¥.
ar
j
de
- thts
"As in Options A and B - With increasing volume of
piitient caie the possibility of suboptimal or poor
If the patient load is
pe:rformance may increase - ?
|
*
Elexible, ~
{
Set ee meee mene tenet
roneof
2 NBMERt
stgnifi—
There will need to be approximately a doubline of the operatdng budget with =. 66% increase
Cc st/effcctiveness
medical program.- [t would be
Ti ming
As in Cptions A and B.
.
prudent to separate the
identify of the Bikini-
of
Eniwetok group from BNL ~
This is the optimum time, in light
the poli-sical and sociologic situation in the Marshalls
ch ange the mage of the study.
function as advisors, but
a subcontra tor might
alleviate some of the
anxiety of the new study
group th.t would arise from
the "radiation" oriented
|
terested party. Funding for
i
this increase in primary care!
threagh funding from DOT.
9052221
As in Options A and B.
to enlarge “he program and to make a positive effort to
trative control and
tight be obtained by pass~
.:d logistic
stiould not se attenpted.
in personnel and a ship
assigned specifically to the
BNL group.
We would suggest
the University of Hawaii as
the most suitable and in-
-vraitment ~ this
Suipport - Cxpanaded operations wit!. ut these elements
| We could retain adminis-
tCsupport,
Ov
czim be offset by adequate plannit.
prirary care is expected.
; “Ad
Oe
apd
a
,
R- isk
As in Options 4 and B.
doubled and increased,
a
ae 724
oe
As in Opi ions A and B - plus added credit for more
cimprehensive care.
Eniwetok 7? Ujelang.
re
;
Larger res.onsibility for care and better support (logistic
Where: As in Options A and B plus Kili, Jaluit, ?
°
Selection Criteria
Louw
terms of:
As in Options A and
B - 5 nce this is our
present level of
5 apron”
ed
ng
@
Vv.
attaining the objectives, with
each approach being stated in
refined objectives
in consideration
of restraints,
‘
Analysis
Develop
to
+s possible approaches
.
Restatement of
®
of
wk
IV.
|
;
309222 |