IIl. Translations . me, ion will, nallése { on Sage What: iunds - no significant translation o° objectives is needed Set for: the criteria for the selection of an approach: Farform.ic2or results As iv Options A and B. As in Options A and B, Total _.st “As in Opecions A and B. See column IV. — How: for discussion of costs. Who: As in Options A and B. —pls all patients, exposed operation with existing to iow level radiation wie have already gone through BNL ; Flexibility As in Uprions A and B - Increasing flexibiiity due to status of Bikini and Eniwetok aiid manpower) - permits better scheduling. screening procedure - again . will change requirements. Avoidance«= untoward consequences , we When: ee! ‘aa a How: Bog: a te fo a : Ais ; 4° 4; ‘ ¥. ar j de - thts "As in Options A and B - With increasing volume of piitient caie the possibility of suboptimal or poor If the patient load is pe:rformance may increase - ? | * Elexible, ~ { Set ee meee mene tenet roneof 2 NBMERt stgnifi— There will need to be approximately a doubline of the operatdng budget with =. 66% increase Cc st/effcctiveness medical program.- [t would be Ti ming As in Cptions A and B. . prudent to separate the identify of the Bikini- of Eniwetok group from BNL ~ This is the optimum time, in light the poli-sical and sociologic situation in the Marshalls ch ange the mage of the study. function as advisors, but a subcontra tor might alleviate some of the anxiety of the new study group th.t would arise from the "radiation" oriented | terested party. Funding for i this increase in primary care! threagh funding from DOT. 9052221 As in Options A and B. to enlarge “he program and to make a positive effort to trative control and tight be obtained by pass~ .:d logistic stiould not se attenpted. in personnel and a ship assigned specifically to the BNL group. We would suggest the University of Hawaii as the most suitable and in- -vraitment ~ this Suipport - Cxpanaded operations wit!. ut these elements | We could retain adminis- tCsupport, Ov czim be offset by adequate plannit. prirary care is expected. ; “Ad Oe apd a , R- isk As in Options 4 and B. doubled and increased, a ae 724 oe As in Opi ions A and B - plus added credit for more cimprehensive care. Eniwetok 7? Ujelang. re ; Larger res.onsibility for care and better support (logistic Where: As in Options A and B plus Kili, Jaluit, ? ° Selection Criteria Louw terms of: As in Options A and B - 5 nce this is our present level of 5 apron” ed ng @ Vv. attaining the objectives, with each approach being stated in refined objectives in consideration of restraints, ‘ Analysis Develop to +s possible approaches . Restatement of ® of wk IV. | ; 309222 |