Bias AND “Sr RETENTION FROM RONGELAP FOODS 147 Table L— INTAKE DATA FOR %Sr AND 8'Cs IN RONGELAP FOOD, JULY 2 TO 8, 1963 Intake for seven-day period Food item Sr, pe 8%Cs, pe Calcium, g Pandanus . Coconut: milk Coconut meat Total intake Average intake per day Picocuries of *"Sr per gram of calcium 4,379 57,327 5,656 2,824 0.329 0.460 4,483 65,9807 1,781 9,401 0.254 56 48 640 ; 0,992 2,517 major portion of the activity of both’ radionuclides. The average "Sr and “'Cs intake per day from these Rongelap foods was about 20 and 60 times higher, respectively, than from a normal New York City area diet during this time.’ Initially, the activity from the Rongelap food essentially masked the contribution from the normal diet, but later in he study the effect of the normal diet on the excretion rates became increasingly normal important. In retrospect, it was unfortunate that the diet of the subject was not measured because the sr and ICs levels in foods were increasing during this period. The *Sr and the *’Cs levels found in the urinary and the fecal coilections are given in Table 2 and are plotted as a function of time in Figs. 1 and 2. Calcium measurements were made on the food and excreta samples, but, since the calcium intake from the normal diet was not Known, the urinary and fecal calcium excretion data are diificult to interpret quantitatively. The average urinary calcium was 170 + 40 mg/day, and the average fecal calcium was 360 = 150 mg/day. These values do not indicate a metabolic abnormality, although the low fecal caicium reflects a very high absorption. In Fig. 1 the ‘70s excretion via the urine and the feces is plotted. The smcothed curves through the data points were drawn by eye. As has been observed in other studies,’?-!7 the main means of **"Cs ex- cretion is urine. Fecal excretion fell off very rapidly, indicating that only a. relatively small amount of the Was ingested was not absorbed. Nelther the urinary nor the fecal excretion rate fell to preexperiment levels at the end of 190 days. This was probably due io the increase in the normal diet '*’Cs which took place during this period. The excretion pattern of "Sr as shown in Fig. 2 contrasts markedly with that of /*'cs. The fact that the majority of the ingested Sr was absorped by the body is evidenced by the high fecal excretion levels tuat were observed almost immediately following the consumption of

Select target paragraph3