exposure period for background
The background

exposure was essentially all contributed by cosmic radiation during the
3-month exposure period and during
the aircraft flight to LLL.
Additional TLD's were stored on
the periphery of the lead pig to
identify possible inadvertent
exposures.

The average background

exposure for the two types of TLD's
was subtracted from all field

Nal scintillator response — uR/h

determination.

measurements so that the results
represent only the terrestrial
radiation exposure rates.

o

We

found that sunlight had a negligible
effect on this packaging arrangement.

Fig.

!

L

l

!

Comparison of responses of
the Nal scintillator and the

2.

pressurized ion chamber.

results obtained with the Nal

linear, deviates more markedly from

scintillator and the pressurized

ion chamber is presented in Fig.

2.

the L:l relationship.

The TLD results indicated that

The ion chamber readings have been

the cosmic-ray

contribution at that latitude.

i

lon chamber response — uR/h

The correspondence between the

reduced by 3.3 uR/h,

|

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

The

the CaF,

TLD's overresponded by
2
approximately 214 relative to the Lif.

figure shows that the Nal seintilla-

This is consistent with similar

tor overresponded because of its

studies made at Enewetak Atoll and

nonlinear energy characteristics.

with environmental monitoring per-

The discontinuity at about 30 UR/h

formed by LLL in the U.S.

occurs at a range switching point

response varies with energy and this

on the scintillator.

ratio (1.21) corresponds to an

Three locations

The over-

were measured on both Low and high

average gamma energy of about 500

range, and those results are

keV.

shown

in Solid

On the

circles.

This is reasonable based on

the Ca¥,

2

enhanced low-energy response
13

scintillation instrument's low

and the predominance of

range of 0 to 30 uR/h, a correspondence

activities distributed in the soil.

near 1:1 is observed.

the correspondence, though

as

JUL Go 08
aera

range,

On the higher

To assess

“os

the beta contribution

to the Lil’ exposure rates,

various

Select target paragraph3