thicknesses of aluminum absorbers

Calibration of the pressurized

were placed over an array of dosimeters

ion chamber against a point

at three sites on Bikini Island.

source,

feather analysis of

A

the beta attenua-—

Opa

the method used with the

instrument in this study,

leads to

tion curves gave a maximum beta

about a 3% overestimate in the

energy between 1.5 and 2.2 MeV.

measurement of "typical'' environmen-

Given the known predominance of

tal fields in this country.

70,

r-

90

YY beta activities in the soil,

If a

similar correction were made to

this energy range is consistent with
90

these data,

The analysis also revealed that the

determinations (ion chamber and LiF

average beta contribution to the

TLD) would be within 10%.

total LiF exposure rates was 274% --

considered to be satisfactory

a vather significant contribution.

apreement between the two reference

Therefore,

techniques used in this work.

the 2.27 MeV

Y beta radiation.

it was necessary to reduce

the agreement of the twa

independent exposure-rate

This is

the LiF results by this amount to

Hence,

obtain the free-air gamma-ray

the Nal scintillation readings were

exposure rates.

normalized to the output of the

The comparison between the ion

on the basis of

these results,

pressurized ion chamber.

chamber results and the LiF gamma—

Fig.

3.

<A linear regression of the

two data sets gives agreement of

about 13% between the two methods.
One also finds that the correlation
of points in Fig. 3 is not as good
as

that in Fig.

2.

This difference

is most likely due to the beta contribution to the LiF results, which
may vary throughout the islands,
causing spread in the data.

oy

0

Departure from the 1:1 relationship
in Fig.

lon chamber response — uR/h

ray exposure rates is presented in

O

response or to insufficient
consideration of the ion chamber

30

Fig. 3.

40

50

4

60

|

7

80

Comparison of responses of
the pressurized ion chamber
with LiF TLD's.
The contribution due to cosmic radiation
has been

weducd

~—,
ane

a

‘Senet

data for energy dependence.

20

yy

LiF response — uR/h

3 may be due to an over-

correction of the TLD data for beta

10

to}

subtracted.

Select target paragraph3