The next viewgraph (LRA-54) indicates that we have several communities with multiple sites. Now there's several different reasons why we have In some cases, like Albuquerque is a good communities with multiple sites. example, we do have some information that leads us to believe that there could be significant deposition from Nevada material in Albuquerque. So ind that we have included three sites, because it is a large town, so we can examine that question. Flagstaff, I think we have less reason to believe there is significant deposition there, but it is a large town which has three good sites? The other reason for doing this is to have a sufficient 10 number of locations with two samples ll variability within the-same location. such that we can look at sample _ 12 Now at some other sites, Boise is a good example, we had many areas 13 which had the same cesiumflux asmeasured with our field spectrometer, and om Ny 14 one site which had essentially-twice as much flux as any of the others. 15 Unfortunately, 16 better make sure that we included that, measured both of the areas. 17 Vegas is included, e.g., primarily because, again, it is a relatively large 18 town. 19 within the same area. that happened tobe the State Capitol, We want to look at two sites that Las are geographically separated — 20 That coneludes my presentation, Mr. Chairman. 21 DR. CAROTHERS: so we thought we'd Lynn, have you, or has Any questions? EML -- I'm sure they must 22 have -- selected sites and taken a sample or two where you would expect to 23 find no NTS fallout at all? 24 DR. ANSPAUGH: — We have not done that yet oursetves. I think EML has 25 done quite a bit of work on that. 26 samples along the west coast of California to look at that. 27 28 DR. CAROTHERS: We do intend to take some additional I was just wondering, because then if you did that when you got done certain assumptions ought to be checked in a way. 197 Phil,