laboratory analysis for cesium-137. geographical coverage here. Now you see we have some pretty good We do have some holes over in the area here in the region of some interesting areas in Nevada that we simply have not been able to locate sites which we feel comfortable with even on a B-level. we are looking for some additional sites over in areas in Nevada. So But, as you can see, we have extended our coverage now to a fairly good coverage of Arizona, northern Arizona, and we have extended our coverage in several areas here which were not originally tabulated by the Test Manager's Committee. 10 . 12 13 We have some areas in Idaho where we believe there probably was some fairly substantial fallout deposition that are now included; and we have some areas here in Utah which we hope might help give us some additional information on how material got to Salt Lake City. Now one of the tools we used that has been referred to before in this 14 process was this book. Every member of the group had this book. 15 in here is a photograph of the site, Frosty's site description, the results 16 of the Livermore measurement, Included and also notes and maps; and I would hope 17 that you might pick out your favorite site and actually come and look at 18 this book--we will leave it up here--and perhaps get a feel for the type of 19 information that was available to us when we made the site selection. 20 There is also shown up here a larger map, so that you can look at it 21 without looking at the viewgraphs. 22 you'd care to study this. 23 The next viewgraph 24 We have several materials available, if (LRA-53). One of the recommendations of this Committee was that we provide a sufficient number of sites that we could 25 make a comparison between our normal method of calculation of doses which 26 is based upon external exposure rate measurements. 27 based upon contemporary measurements of cesium in soil. 28 sites are included in Phase II in order to make that comparison. 196 This other method is So that these 10