ainsi The Committee reiterated their previous recommendations that the subtitles of research projects be more clearly defined by specifically describing the work of each project. They further recommended that in reporting contracts renewed or a,proved that such conteacts be listed in the following order: new projects first, followed by renewals; list the projects in order of priority which show the most promise, It was stated that this information would be valuable to the Committee in reviewing the list and will afford them a method of approach in their review. It was further recom- mended that after the investigator's name, it should be indicated precisely where tne work is performed i.e. University of California, Berkeley, Davis, or Los Angeles as the case may be. The Committee stated also that it snould be indicated on the list of projec s whether or not the investigator is utilizing sraduate students on the training and teaching aspects in connection with his AEC contract, They f-lt that this would be a significant justification for carrying on off- site research work, These suggestions will be adopted and placed