ia

.

PRATT, HUGH S.
-

.

~

eo

eee

mee ones

125- 14-6535
eee ee Lk nk eee

-

Due to the small number of. exposed and the mobility of the total study group

among different atolls, the analysis of detected pathology (observed/expected——
obtained by enhanced vital statistics) leaves a very large standard error.
The
longevity of the study and the frequency of the examinations has strengthened the
anelysis and by judicious grouping of subpopylations, some meaningful analysis is

possible (particularly in Rongelap, exposed at less than age 10).

A review of the

data base by Dr. Brian MacMahon, Professor of Epidemiology at Harvard, has strengthen
the analysis by advising the re-establishment of the cohort study.
.
Pitfalls:
The pitfalls and Limitations in the study can be discussed in the following
.

framework:
A.

am

Lo
*

.

.

ve.
7.

:

.

7
:

Methodologic

1)
The changing carcinogenic environment duringthe study r
question of the control for these variables.
Doss

as the
.

2)
The small (244) exposed groups and. the heterogenous control/coaparison
groups makes statistical analysis difficult.
.
_ 3)
The dichotomy between the research goals and the humanitarian primary
care demands of the study has led to misunderstanding and misconceptions among the
scientific and supporting groups and between the scientific party and the Marshallese

both within and outside the study group.
B.

-

Political

1)
The accident victims have suffered severe psycho-social trauma.
They
are truly a unique subpopulation of the Marshallese, with a different perception of

the goals and responsibilities of the study.

2)
U.S. and/or Trust Territory policies of repawration/compensation has
, reinforced #1 (above) and in some cases has subsidized “illness” as opposed to

rewarding “health”.

mentality.

3)

This philosophy has supported an "illness"-oriented welfare
.

The international abreaction toe nuclear weapons has given the exposed

group and their supporters throughout the world inordinate political leverage,

through litigation and adverse public relations (anti-U.S.+ AEC +» ERDA + DOE ~+BNL).
4)

The program, since its inception, has been a cooperative effort between

the medical team and the TT health care delivery system.
At the present time, the
Marshallese are moving rapidly towards a political status, unique in international

law, called "free association".

Basically, the U.S. would retain the use of

"strategic areas" but the newly-established Marshallese government would control most
other internal and external mechanisms of a new nation.
Current negotiations have
stressed the continued responsibility of the U.S. for follow-up of the study groupThere is no clear delineation between primary care, responsibilities of the new
government and the DOE/BNL program.
The provisional leaders are currently seeking
a contract HMO to
C.

take over their health care delivery system.

Geographic
1)

The smahl land mass in relatioa tu

the huge gosographic area of

Marsheiis presents seriou. communicucton amd trancpartution problemas.
7

the

The Logistic

Select target paragraph3