eleng with the nermel Clustuction ia require-

ments of this type estivity.
(b)

2% would reduce te o minism extra require
mente for support ef the raf-sefe estivity
whieh would be required if the eperatian were
to be steaffe’ wit! some ether agency.

(e) Generally, emly 40% to 50% of the Suppert Cen
trester's persennel wring : test peried live
eat HTS.

Phe reansinder osmmte te Las Voges

whieh means that eonp support in the fern of
housing, ote., would be lees then fer ony other

egeney.

BEST COPY AVAILABLE

(4) There would be me trevel or per dies charges
in the we ef the Support Geatraster.

|

(e) There would be ao confusion op te responsibility

for operction of red-sefe feailitios,

(2) There would be o mininua of mobilisation snd
denobilizetion eoste.

(g) It ds Believed thet erose-ue of equipment and
even personnel to Feeifie eperations sould be

eecompliched to « saxinun extent wits 6 winiaee
ef paper werk.

b.

DOE ARCHIVES

Possible Objections:

From pest reviews md diseussions, it sppeaers some ergunenta
may be s@vanced by participeting agencies against the proposed
“lie

74

Select target paragraph3