30 Table 18 Rongelap Thyroid Abnormalities, Age Specific Incidence (1966)* Nodules Age at exposure No. exposed No. a) 13 9 11-15 7 0 6-10 6 16-20 >20 5 24 Hypothyroidism Total abnormalities Ge No. % No. 69.2 2 15.4 11 4 66.7 0 2 0 8.3 - 0 - - - ~ % of Group 84.6 4 66.7 0 2 0 8.3 0 - 0 *In 55 living of original 64 Rongelap people in heavily exposed group. One nodule in womanin less exposed group (not included in table). Table 19 Thyroid Abnormalities (Nodules and Hypothyroidism) in Marshallese Populations Examined 1964-1966 Age (1954) <C10 yr ' Island group Rongelap Ailingnaet Estimated — thyroid dose ** No. examined - Uurikt No. examined 78.9 12 f 350-600 y 175 0.0 f 175-300 y 69 0.0 { 25-55 0.0 y 14 f 700-1400 y¥ 175 6 f 275-550 y 69 0.0 l f 55-110 0.0 16 y 14 61 - 0.0 Age (1954) 20-40 yr i No. examined Estimated thyroid dase** Estimated thyroid dose** %o Abnormalities 19 40 Unexposed (Rongelap and Utirik) Age (1954) 10-19 yr 36 - 0.0 Age (1954) >40 vr* % No. Abnormalities examined % Abnormaliues All ages % Abnormalities No. examined % Abnormalities Rongelap 14 Z 160 y 175 14.3 10 0.0 55 30.9 Ailingnaet 4 {54 25.0 3 0.0 14 7.4 7 69 Utrikt 22 116 y 14 4.5 21 4.8 99 2.0 Unexposed (Rongelap and Utirik}) 48 - 0.0 49 6.1 194 1.5 *Dosage in this group was the sameasin the 20 to 40-year group. **{= Dose from 8 and y radionuclides; y =dose from external y radiation. tIn estimating the thyroid doses to the Ailingnae and Utirik exposed group it was assumed that such doses were proportional to the thyroid doses of the Rongelap exposed group. based on relative whole-body gamma dosereceived.