The third alternative, requested by the Bikinians, uses the spoil to build a causeway, connecting Bikini and Eneu, a distance of some 8 km. The increment in cost for this alternative over the other two is estimated at about $40 million. As noted, our cost estimates may be on the high side, but on be about twice as in any event expensive as a relative basis the land-extension or the causeway would lagoon-dumping Also, questions have been raised regarding the environmental a structure. alternatives. impact of such Presumably these negative factors would have to be balanced against the assessed positive value to the Bikini community. would be the U. go S. Also decisive government's perception of its obligation, beyond restoring Bikini to a state if any, to functionally equivalent to that of 1946, A major environmental the disposal of the Excavation removes regarding the spoil the may "richest" be)- relates to layer of soil, Bikini and deat with Island there productivity of the newly created rooting application of fertilizer. To impact of the excavation approach (whatever is itself. uncertainty zone, even after The matter has not been tested. this and related questions, the Committee has . requested support for the following pilot trials at Bikini, to be completed within two years. (a) After removing the top 30-60 cm of soil, productivity would be tested with and without fertilizer which blocks compaction that vehicles. Cesium-137 results fertilizer treatment cesium-137 from and the uptake), use of and heavy strontium-90 would (including high-potassium with and earth-moving be assayed without or in the the trucking crops as well as in the residual soil to insure that they are at anticipated levels. {b) The spoil generated in these trials would be used to build a pilot segment of perimeter strip (including berm). Its stability would be observed, and tne diffusion from it of cesium-137 and strontium-90, which ~ might contaminate ground water, would be measured. 5000031 *