4

*

lane’

fee

tas
~

:

!

,
Hog ieee

vee

.

SB Ba the

barat

‘

+.

fy

eeSos
OM gee -

a

“&

oe

a sete
‘ t

wat

a

‘

ay

rk ete re ae no SP bw bene aoe

See

t
i

}

i

and generat toxicefes. sy reuin Lio studins, Dae vohurme an

:

elivels Un the HUG aides

:

oaas

:

loge (32), some vt w bigs

wre

CARCINOGENESIS

eaue-n in time and space, radiation

{

vep.y “all be assumed to be sufficient
se qt carrier, etc. Thus the chemical
a -wts enter primarily as determinants of

!

The most common, mast feared. and mosr studied long termtox ologic effec:
lonizirg rediatic ~
of deposited rad) ymuchies is the induction of neopla
ed@enisistcind Gods bas pre pes could hans sedis tu be noun a ursersal carer. ges ie aiforms.a pracnd bets cart les photens, neutrons, accelerated partis...
heavy nucler, cle. ceices has beea demoustrated to occur either in increased
incidence or by temporal advancement of normal incidence with moderate to
high doses. That it can occur at low doses is a reasonable exirapoiauon but subeect
to much controverss see Dose-Response section).
None of these cancers are unique to ionizing radiation but can be caused by u
variety of olier agents. and there is growing interest in the role of promotiona:
agenis, i.¢.. co-carcinogens such as viral agents (33), and chemical agents (}. 341
Calvin (3*) speculates that the three most studied modes of carcinogenest-—-viral, chemical, and radiation—mas have a molecular process in common, although %r2t sreof of this has not vet appeared,
That these processes may involve somatic mutations has been believed possible
for at lee.t twdecades, Recent reconsideration af the pheromend of patoduc
and radein) toaicolvey on the theors of steady-state mutauon rates (76) reaso7s
the rl.
wtarcugh cna gener. basis using 2bsolute rate thee ry --a Oreekthroug: trom au: all-too-common dependence on stricily Gbserationa:
aorroa ches,
In tne period covered by this paper. potential for carcinogenesis cf a large
v ariely of radioncclides has beer revigsed and documented protisety (4-8,

+ te diaribution of radiation dose both

,

j

‘

1: wolce. of radionuclides, despite the
ta Suruadis external to the budy sucn as

|
‘

baa tlle.

t

+ :itvs are similar to the acute radiation

he Beart (ou. serological chauges C415, UnAUNO-

noedly poneched gaaarallip work fram hk goretorias

Tore, greauk, indebtel to G, VW. Dolphia
for his editing of the uunsiatio gs oF aé€voumes into Engish.

}

“sion. These, in turn, control biological

Zn jachudes,

in other privts cs “Pawar We ore, ther

,

a
Lose is 30 Tahiy developed
7 ‘yas Use mentioned to ve accounted

{

_—

wee

i
:

'
,

CARCINOGENES'S BY ALPHA EMITTERS
Polio opccluzed omeclices bro or - The classic heruhmar’ Tor the cto.
of veo asa induc sdbin man by radionuclides ts found in studies cf Cial priniess
re Sup chor ate acd patients reels mo radium as a therapentig nostrurp, The

Trot, seen after moderate doses of

» *1Do (8) This entire aren hus
‘.estenive USSR work added bv

inovadt nicites are 7?°Ra (helt-l-fe 620 x 225 Ba Meso:vortam. half:

:

hops
ut

is

“Om ONTA RAS en Ie ToviLe oo
se dskata (23) Phew cee
‘2, cadiactive cobali, sodium.
vata abd 748 uranium 427): and
.

Ce

Oye
wet
tes
Ss
ae ae To
aS tte
og
akar’ COM
. OF. ravans
siytye (257.
4
POS OMG
sabe
a
Var Oe
wadtbra.

as ©°Co, 5% e, ©3Zn, 3°S,
‘
cach

a

aa

ne
Sth
1
aT)
i Of genera
tu
3} pathorogy
ho:
,
£4 (23). Lace ARGattis
toe- SuuERT
irom tne sewnpoini

ais. exfeents normaly present in the

‘, te radiation sickness

DNTP ET wen

}

b cerecing radiation produced. With
tay tatural uranium and thorium,
coro, Except inciventaily, this is not
ud ciuuftslances, e.g. the lowcarcinowed io the high carcinogenicity of
ade ER which tempt introduction of a
rocide. Another evample is that

"-

roe

San

.
ayine cells, Gssues. anc organs

pnerdcrlaty with nuclices tiat are
aed therefore the tissues in which they
, aitasws iy derived from their progres«of varderate doses of greatest interest
“rumerous forms of patholoev
+ fierosis: vascular pathologyincludii) disturbances; transient and lor.tt monspecitic changes including {:fe12 4 ittusted to specific pathological changes
ats “y4 Goses usually must be inferred

ot

t

IPE RATIONS
»

may ep

a

~——_

.

.
2

ros

wp theay mri ducts

£

'
Pater

RST

ne
Ceaes

t

DOMIEPT gine +
“eva

an :

over Dia

iabou
Ur
unevposed imaichcd fring

whee

;

f
t

a

.

i

‘
opt,

ca

¥,
.
Wien
TE oaennmge
ap

Sense ae ag tone em eg ten

FARRAescnnETRUE

PME oei‘

“asp peptighemchatbelyea b- Poreegitsirhenh wt a

Fete
ee

ot

Bok

ATT PRURagRRA, AIR Ome
meue:eee tert: le seemer
aedLEMay tae eLIP»,
tet NevaLed ip eta ibepeg, nap rast Seared Fees
:

\
WA TE.

pooh arp

oe
o.

Ty hye ater fa AE LP

.

eed Tu

ae te

Fy tthe

Heer hg et

t

1

atdee
she

ve

hos

AEM tach

aye

yo,

Beree ty dee REE AL
any otebeetLie

Ma

rahe Me

Pe a NLA,

ae gen

‘

Gate temp hora Re FE aeguy

rey

yt

eta

Be

TE

+

FR

Fy py riley sf 1S Ue rnatak W's Ee Wantage Pe ae ELPAMg ohn
.

aa

~¢

.

Py Eh Rae

-”

NE Cad a gd ta led ee,

:

arb ta

a
weg et ae We

is

Rhea

PO be

Teh ge hee et 8

Select target paragraph3