ty “4 (F% ptoll. (. te si Essentially, it represents a compromise of cost, radio- -oreticalls bse logical and other factors, which will be far short of the Fail 4 "Case 5", ade Ne (Vol. I, § 5.4.5). Exclusive of contaminated soil and scrap disposal costs, the cleanup cost ‘for Case 3 is $35.5 million and-.for Case 5 it is $81.6 miilion. Comparative soil disposal cost estimates are $7 million for Case 3 ~~ end $92.2 for Case 5. We appreciate the political and practical realities of seeking "sums on the order of $100 million from the United States Congress in these times of grave concern about the economy, but given the rationable stated above, it is Case 5 for which funding should be — Sought and for which funding should be given. ee . Finally, quite apart from any cost-benefit analysis of the * clear testing rrcsgram, _” - ~ as a result of a recert decision of tho United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Saipan, etc. v. U.S. (People of Dept. of the Interior, etc., 502 F.2d 90 -(1974)), the obligations imposed by the Trusteeship Agreementunder which the United States administers the Micronesian Islands has become legally binding and enforceable. Under the terms of Article C of the Trusteeship Agreement, the United States is required to "promote the eccnomic advancement and self-sufficiency" of the Enewetak People; to "protect [them] against the loss of their lands and resources"; to “promote the social advancement" of the Micronesians; and to "protect [their] health." obligations. Beyond that, These are the express like any trustee, the United States bears implied duties to protect and promote the best interests of the beneficiary in every way. _ .- _ - eo oem Es Tae eeTae a moo: so ' ao 2 . teat , ‘ oc % : * Ty aeeT ” tog ee t a" ay ragrrr4 oes ep . nyMees 8 od SEi . 7 eer ra 4 ‘\ » ‘ : eei.ghee : Petey PT pate tal gs te they“eefe i eo et age, ena BG Ry oawk wr BS 4ED"a vie OT te Ee gedfarateee:fePDA?ings wetcite vat rd . i 3