is that there is a practical way to reduce the exposure for the people at Rongelap by not using foods from the northern end. If you do use foods from the northern end, certainly there will be more radiation in the body and a slightly greater risk, be it small, however. But that definitely it will increase the levels in the body, hut we are just saying that in the way radiation is handled worldwide, if you have a practical way to reduce it, the exposure, you will do it. And we are saying that this opportunity exists at Rongelap by simply not using the northern foods anymore than is \ really necessary. Marshallese: On this paper, it states that the amount of radiation in any part of the body for Rongelap would be 2,500. 500. Now that's a lot more than Is there going to be some problem with that? Robison: The 2,500 number shown here is the total amount over 30 years, not one year, and the comparable number for 30 years is 5000. the total amount estimated for 30 years, not one. So this is And the standard, the guideline for a 30 year exposure is 5000, and that represents the number estimate for Rongelap island. Buck: Oh, Rongelap island? Robison: Yes, Rongelap island. Marshallese: It sounds like it is decreasing. You said that all of this is decreasing, so how did it reach, what 5000? 2500? How come it is 2500 if it is decreasing? Ray: The amount per year is decreasing. But all of the years have to add up. Robison: ‘Buck: If it starts out, for example, let's say the first year is 450... 30 times 400 is 12,000. 46