LEU LA2T t-te and icerete remventitns, = hotel on public une claintiffs land in Saican. urged that such a Among lease wés ited States to "promote *the economic (an) vw w oF 4 t 3 D } ' '$ { L ‘ | att -itlitive of the srovisions of Article VI, § 2 of tne Trusteeshio elvinwement ani self-sufficiency of the inhabitants, and to this = # # regulate the use of natural resources" and to "prevect tne inhabitants against the loss of their lands and resources * * * ~ger-ant o4 we STZ F.23 at 37. ." The Ninth Circuit held that the Trusteeship constitutes the basic constitutional d@ocunent for she ceirls of the Trust Territory and that the rights asserted were tunitielily enforceabsle. Tne court said, at pages 97-99: onaerence of features in this Trusteesnhis Agreement tne invention to establish direct, i: enforceable rights. arrirmative, and The issue involves the linacal 2 y gna environment, not security; the contern with Y2curel resources and the concern with politic21 development are axpliciti: in the agreement and are general international 2onzernt 23 well; the enforcement of these riznts reauires ~2ttle Lez2l or administrative innovation in tne domestics [rra3; and the alternative forum, the Security louncil, would rresent to ithe plaintiffs obstacles so great as to make tneir risnts virtually unenforceable. # . . * * . we hold chav the 5LesteestP Agreement 15 a source of individuel lezal rights “VY. The Frreliminary Relief Sought By Plaintiffs mere is Required By The Trusteeship Agreement And By NEPA Irn his letter cf August 12, 1968, President Johnson nowed =.- Titense Dererimenat aonclusion that ���security 2°32 nell wnat, agreement issues recutrements"” under orincizctes of in the Pesclie of Saican case first instance in the Trust Territor: Wigh however, was based upon the Secretary of the "nis departmeny did not participate in anvwar @ lease to Concinental." are 9052120 5252 F.2d ar 99. indiscutatl: rartiaicatine in sf ootmity tar have neo cissitle a Sars, and directins apolicacion