NAME: HAP 133080 1865 Mr. PAGE MITCHELL. Excuse me. 80 The EPA has also said, 1866 somewhere in everybody's files, the letters are there, 1867 numbers millirem per 1868 30 years, I mentioned They have 1870 Mr. and 1872 later. 1873 ask to be YATES. them. I We different 1875 an 1876 back to Enjebi? opinion as 1878 Dr. WACHHOLZ. 1879 (Laughter. ) 1880 Mr. YATES. judgment. best thing in July. but to do is this I don't know. Do is bring EPA in a year or people not these you want to express would you like If I had an to express option, ought to go an opinion? I would Suppose you sat where Dr. prefer not to. Brill sits and Dr. others. WACHHOLZ. May I comment on some of the previous testimony? 1884 Mr. YATES. 1885 Dr. WACHHOLZ. Sure you may. We received a copy of their testimony 1886 during the lunch hour, 1887 look at it other than, superficial/} 1888 Just from what they said, 1889 5 ren in You would rather not do it. Wachholz, Dr. year, Maybe the new EPA will come to a to whether Bender and the the that conclusion. Dr. 1883 think did 1877 1882 applied with We have anew EPA. 1874 1881 500 these are not absolute ceilings. 1869 1871 before, and significant so I have not had an opportunity to disagreement in Glance through it. I don't think we have any terms of the actual risk