NAME: HAP 133080 PAGE §5 1261 ago, 1262 perspective of a behavioral scientist, what effect it may 1263 have upon he people to keep them away from Enjebi. 1264 evaluation has 1265 the 1266 speak 1267 effects to take record, a look YATES. 1269 Mr. MITCHELL. 1270 effects, 1271 Mr. YATES. 1272 Mr. MITCHELL. 1274 1275 Mr. badly, very feel We the read conelusion The are are There them report says, ill potential the people away? ill potential away. they want to go home? very They want as long as to opportunity the from keeping right. si His Enjebi. away from are. from the a written report for es There in keeping That tell us to have him effects There and to you In other words, YATES. Brill. and No ill health effects They this, like would from keeping people Mr. home. of that question. to 1268 1273 all been provided and we briefly at they cannot. submitted after badly to go stating by Drs. Bender premises: ‘'We have reexamined our earlier Enewetak health effects 1276 1277 estimates 1278 coefficient estimates. 1279 note 1280 agreement 1281 is 1282 Enewetak 1283 to the southern Islands, 1284 will 1285 either our that with revised those entirely possible people, never the result recent dose more the in light of and cancer risk We We find the risk is still small. estimates provided the that resulting remain in by DOE. We remarkably good still conclude radiation exposures from return of the it of the dry Enewetak and the dry Enjebi to their home, in even a single returning population.'' case of disease among