why the tes‘
e:the
singificance
ori ¢
all intents
:
anc yu}
described tt.
’
«
ft
i
Concerning th
c
(20 cases, four wei!
me
1
forer
particular areas ©
One,
it
Fane
'
this gland d:d no?
+
1
yr
Mae
we
ww LV
ALY
*
’
1
Le
times, espec.alls
¢*
90
,
.
Srv") mentrer as med
estimated
for
a@dlui'
‘
this
factor
in 1963 and
%
unt:
a
hoya
1
aa
“Mat
fo
:
Tk
exede
1 oad 1°
'
thie
fact was over lookec
faced with
whl
}yom1
(964
however
oe
ie
despite the rador:
errors;
:
eee
Malay
:-
the many expert’. wi
for
A
be
‘per
‘
«
4
be
hee
ary de
+,
osJ
wel
ak
roe
g
te
a
deveic
fa
ao
saat hate.
>
\+
roa
*
::
Mention war
rade
no
‘
findings were attr)
point
of view,
it
4
25
doe
€
and considering the
more detai]
the
[O14 196
ree
:‘
'
aot
.
-t
2
+
AOL
b{o
gA0 OO
‘
aa
ME
year aCw. oe
®
q
ad
‘
.