In mnny c~ses individuals ~rrivod in the forwwrd ~.rcawith- out ‘this oommnnd h~,vingrocoivod Q clonranco ITDSSPCU j.n accordance with CINCPACts directives. Sinco ATCOM is not o.uthorizodby CINCPAC to initiato such clofirflncos, this nocossitotod action . on the p~rt of ATCOM to obtnin tho zmssagc raquircd~ Even though o st~tomont is usually contnined in tho individunlfs tmvol ordors stcting th~t tho provisions of CINCPAC Serial 020 hfivoboon conqiliodwith and that tho individuc.1hns boon cloarcd fm . entry into ENIWETOK, n copy of the clo~.rnncomossago is tho only cvidcnco of propor clcar~nco th~t ATCOM is authorized to accept= In ~11 ccsos clo~ranco mossngcs wore cvcn- tunlly obtnincd; howovor, at times ATCCM was rcquirod to dco.1with tho hondquortcrs th~t initi~tcd trevcl orders and in somo cfisosit wns found thfltthose ho~.dqunrtcrsdid not possess n copy of CINCPAC Lottor Scrinl 020. This nccossitntod R series of mossmges before o proper clc!?rnncocould bc obt~.inodth~rcby erecting an unncccss~ry burden on communication facilities and o.lengthy t~~c l.opscwhich could havo boon olimin~tcd if J!TCCMhod boon permitted to gr~nt suah clocrnnco bnscd on a review of subjock?s 201 file nnd n proper sta%omcnt in the individu?l~s tre.vclordcrso During tho opcrntion Tosk Group 7.3 ~.ssumcdthe responsibility for olc~.ringfillVCSSCIS under their opcr~tiorwl control into tho PPG~ All probloms crcatcd by tha trnnsfor of respon- sibility woro offcctivoly rosolvcd by C1OSO coordin”.tionmd mutu~l ~.ssist,-nco among the security officors of onch Tc.skGroup. Inter-islnnd nnd inter-atoll txwvcl rs WO1l ~s dopo.rturcs from tho PPGworc govorncd by the SOP*S published by CJTF SEVEN, .,.