+9 to that of the phantomywhichwas.ceugteddor J) min (Figure 324. . In future whole-body counting of these peuple; it will be possible, by counting for longer periods and using an 4-in,Nat criietat, te"impreve tie . absolute measurenignt Of gimp amounts of other radionuclides that may bepresént. Since a total of 227 Marshallese persons were surveyed with the whole-body counter, in addition . ~ BRRUATS.AND DISCUSSION All thég@gygat uae above methods were usedtor estimating the body burdens of gamnma- and betaCONT ragonuctides in the Marshallese people. Individgal values for all the people examined in 1959 mav be found in Appendix 7 for gamina spectrograpiine analyses and ie Appendix 4 tor radiochemical analyses ta numerous controls, the spectral analyses were performed with the aid of a 704 IBM computer. Environmental Estimate Radiochemical Procedures the environmental estimate of budy burden. The Twenty -four-hour urine specimens were col- lected in plastic bottles and sent to BNL for radiachemical analysis.A modification of the method ot Farabee’" was used Jor the analysis of Seo" Sr was precipitated as the alkaline phosphate, ashed with HINO) and H.O., and dissolved in dilute HNO. After the solation wag brought up toa volume of 2800 cc, the alkaline earths were com- plexed with EDP A, and the pl was adjusted to 9.9. The solution was then passed through an ion exchange column {Dowes-30 in the Na fori, and the column was riased-with 300 ce ot a solutlomol Ts citne acid and 0.75" EDTA at a pH of 3.0. Phe combined effluents contained 299% of the total Ga. The catunin was then rinsed with 6 A HNO: to remove the Se. Carrier Se was added to the Se" fraction and precipitated with 70% tuning HNO. ¥etrium-GO was milked and counted by the method of the ARC Health and Satety Laboratory." The supernatant from the alkaline phosphate precipitation was measured and divided into wo portions. One portion was scavanged for cestum with added carner by ineans of a duuble precipitation of the aluminum sulfate and the chloroplagnate |! Phe second portion was analyzed for K by flame specirophotometry. Food samples were weighed und drvy-ashed ina mule furnace at BOUPC. The ash was weighed, and asmall poruon was counted tor gross beta acuvity. Phe ash was dissolved in dilute HNO, and processed by the method deserrbed above tor Urine analy sis. All counting was done ina low-level beta aiutcolmadence type of counter, designed and built at BNL. Samples were mounted on glass liber titer discs with ovlon ries and discs and Mylar tilm. Saaiptes were counted agatnst NBS standards processed and courted under identical gearmets One method used (the feast quantiGauve) was environmental estimate of internally-deposited Sr was made in two ways. In the tirst method, animals subsisting on diets simular to buman diets were sacrificed and their tissues were atalvzed radiochermically. A nmunaber ol rats were collected on Roneclap Island at 2, 4, and 5 vears after the 1954 accident. It the diet of these rats, prunarily land plants, was sulficiently saaular to the diet of homan beings inhabiting this area, the rat analyses might serve as indicators of the hunian internal radiation contamunation. Ue Sr’ Cla ratios of Various Ussues of these rats were measured direc t- ly and compared to the catios of the toad and soil on Roagelap collected at Uhe sade ime, that is, the environmental contamination was compared with the directly measured contamination in aniunal tissue. Extrapolation of the cuvironmental data wives the equubtbriuim value winch can be expected, whereas te direct measurement gives the value at the ime of measurement (and thus the percent of the equilibrium value for the individual radionuchdes}. The Sr" Cia ratios for dilerent plant foods on Ronyclap vatied greatly. and the diet of the rats was too uacertam for an “average” diet to be assumed. Vherefore, tor a body burden estimate il was necessary lo use the Se” Ca values of the soil resell Phe “strontium-calctuin Observed ratio” (OR) of Gomar'> was used to denote the preferenual utilization of calcium ta the tallowing manner: OR Sampts “me perce _osr Ca of sample set eee" os ‘ : Se Ca of precursor The Se'" discrimination catia io the «hain fron soll Oto bone (4) via plants (fj) can be expressed as lollows: OR, =(OR, COR, PH (OF(O25; S018.

Select target paragraph3