and amplitudes was uncertain. The air-induced signal propagated with a velocity of the air-blast wave, decreasing with increasing ground range, while the ground-transmitted shock propagated with a velocity: radiation exposure is of little significance at distance; beyond 16,000 fect for surface burstg of yieids up to of about 8,700 ft/sec. The determination of velocities and displacements by means of integration of the acceleration traces was not aftempted—the precision of the data was too poor to support such an analysis. Project 2.2 “Gamma Rate versus Time” (WT-913). Project 1.8 “Dynamic Pressure Investigation” Signal Corps Engineering Laboratori2s; Peter Brown, (WT-911), Ballistic Research Laboratories; E. J. Bryant, Project Officer. The objective was to evaluate dynamic pressure as a damage parameter. Project Officer. In addition, some information regarding the damage effect of long positive-phase duration was to be obtained. A total of 27 jeeps were exposed on Shots 3 and 6; the ground ranges were selected to obtain dynamic pressures comparable in magnitude to those acting upon the jeeps experiencing light to severe damage on Shot 10, Upshot-Knothole. The yield of Shot 3 was too low to give any significant results. The limited results of Shot 6 were not conclusive enough to permit an evaluation of dynamic pressure as 2 damage parameter to be applied to the jeep as a drag-sensitive target. Further, the results did not allow a separation of the effect of dynamic pressure on damage from the effect of the long positive-phase duration. Based on a comparison of Castle and Upahot-Knothole data, Project 1.3 proposed cube-root scaling for vehicle damage. However, a composite AFSWP report, TAR 514 “Damage to Military Field Equipment from Nuclear Bursts” was sub-~ sequently prepared which included the Castle, UpshotKnothole, and all other nuclear-test data. This report concluded that W’-“ scaling was the most ap- propriate method for predicting damage to military field equipment. PROGRAM 2: NUCLEAR RADIATION STUDIES Project 2.1 “Gamma Radiation Dosimetry” (WT-912), Signal Corps Engineering Laboratory; Robert Dempsey, Major, USA, Project Officer. The objectives were to document the in‘tial end residual gamma radiation exposure from high-yicid bursts in order to assist in the evaluation of the resultant gamma radiation hazards, provide data for the correlation of results for other projects, and extend the use of gamma-~radiation dosimetry techniques to higher gamma-exposure ranges. Radiation exposure from a series of nuclear detonations was measured by photographic films and chemical-dosimetry vials of various sensitivity ranges. The film and chemical detectors were placed in protective detector stations at positions from 1 to 15 miles from ground zero for Shots 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6. 15 Mt, iz) the decay rate is affected by the capture products of the thermonuclear devices fired, and (3; the initial-gamma- radiation spectrum for Shot 3 appears harder thanthat obtained from fission devices. Calibrated exposure range of dosimeters used ex- The objective was to document the gamn: ~radiation rate from the detonation of high-vield thermonuclear devices. Two types of measurements were nade: (1) initial-gamma rate versus time at various fixed distances from ground zero and, in particular, the effect on the initial-gammarate due to the passage of the shock from ground zero through the detector station, and (2) gamma-radiation time-intensity datz, which gives information on fallout rate of arrival and gamma-field radiation-decay rate during the period up to 36 hours after the detonation. Ali measurements were made using scintillation detector techniques. The instrument stations were self-contained and required no outside facilities other than timing signals to turn the stations on at a predetermined time prior to the detonation. The expanding firebull and the passage of the shock front from ground zero through the detector station had a marked effect on the initial-gamma rale and hence on the integrated expesure. In general, the inittal-gamina rate decreased relatively slowly after reaching its peak value immediateiy after the detonation, began to rise slowly, and then rose rapidly to the same value as the peak received at time of detonation. After reaching the second peak vaiue, the rate decreased rapidly toward zero value. Theinitial decrease in rate was attributed to the natural decay of the fission products, the slow rise to the expanding of the fireball and approach of the shock front, and the rapid rise to the passage of the shock front through the detector station. These effects were also evidenced in the integrated exposure prior and subsequent to the arrivai of the shock front. The average velocity of the shock front was found to vary with distance from ground zero, decreasing rapidly with distance. The decay exponent from the residual contamination and fallout was found to vary with distance and direction from ground zero. In general, the decay exponent appeared to increase rather abruptly several hours after the detonation. Thie can be attributed to the presence of short-lived isotopes in the residual contamination and fallout. In general, it was indicated that the magnitude of gammaradiation emitted from high-yield thermonuclear devices is considerably lower than the predictions in the Super Effects Handbook (Reference 11). tended from 1 to 60,000 r. In general, it was concluded that (1) initial-gamma- 108 At approximately 2,390-yard range, this handbook indicates the exposure from initi:' gamma from a

Select target paragraph3