AOC RBS
7538
September 25, 1980
REPOSITORY
Donald Pagl
M.D.
Department of Pathology
University of California
Los Angeles, Calif. 90024
Brookhaven Vat. La C
cncae becosaslaut [E. OK!
COLLECTION Li
BOX No. ~7
ce
/
p Files
WA
.
& si
LAQ ha Z DerAkDd,
roLoen PALI,
Dear Don:
The letters have been sent out to recall all the thyroid pathology
specimmne.
We'll work something out in respect to the consultation, but I dontt
know what it's going to be as yet.
lad told you,
I can't find out exactly what Pratt
In respect to your part of the 26 Year Report:
On page 5, line 6, the phrase “test group" confuses me.
Do you
mean medical group that I took out or do you maan the Joint Task Force 77
The latter was certainly capable of extensive dosimetry and making radiochemical meansurements. Whether they did it I do not know.
On page 5, line 13, the word "isopleths” is a new one to me.
Page 5, line 19, I agree that there are very wide margins of error
for doses due to internal deposition, but the error of external gamma
radiation I don't believe is subject to such wide errors.
With the possible modification of these statements, I have
I suspect your discussion of the pathology and clinical course
desire to eliminate cancer as related to the thyroid may cause
lot of trouble. However, that's the way it is and I don't see
for not going ahead and sending it to him.
Best personal regards,
Sincerely,
Eugene P, Cronkite, M.D.
EPC:mb
ie
k 4
no problem.
and the
Conard a
any reason