evaluation of decontamination techniques;
reflected
in the Table 58.
Anti-Aircraft Artillery and Guided Missile
Texas.
the exposures were high, as
(AA&GM) Center, Ft. Bliss,
Three men from this unit were badged with TG 7.1.
probably personnel on temporary duty for radsafe
TG 7.1 recruited from Ft. Bliss
ment).
No other
(TU 7).
They were
During 1953
(Reference 8, September 1953 Install-
activity has been associated with these men.
Ballistic Research Laboratories, Aberdeen, Maryland.
930lst Test Support Unit (Ordnance)
Projects 1.2b and 1.8.
BRL, supported by the
at Aberdeen Proving Ground, staffed
A total of 18 BRL and 930lst TSU personnel are
shown in the Consolidated List of CASTLE Radiological Exposures
(Ref-
erence 13) but only 10 are identified with the projects by name.
posures for two exceeded 3.9 R.
Ex-
Four of the military were Air Force
enlisted men, not soldiers, and their exposures are listed in Table 86
under non-Air-Force organizations in TG 7.1.
The exposures for the
Army personnel and the civilians from BRL and the 930lst are shown
combined under BRL in Table 58.
Corps of Engineers, Washington, D.C.
One civilian participant in Project
6.5, Decontamination and Protection, was exposed to 2.275 R.
Military District of Washington, Hq.
One officer participated with NRL in
Project 2.3 making neutron measurements.
Signal Corps Engineering Laboratories
Monmouth, New Jersey.
His exposure was 2.7 R.
(and Evans Signal Laboratory), Ft.
Eight civilians and eight military participated
in Projects 2.1 and 2.2 in gamma dosimetry and in Projects 6.6, 7.1,
and 7.2 in electromagnetic effects.
offsite participation;
The latter two projects involved
the exposures of the civilian associated with
Project 6.6 was 0.200 R.
The gamma dosimetry projects involved instru-
ment recovery in contaminated areas;
3.9 R.
328
four persons were exposed to over