a er mem
foe
Mr. Cutler contirueé mis briefing Py expliaicing the
and recommendations of the NSC Planning Boarc or she sotone
D-Minus which the Boar hac been requested tc sonsice-
commerts
of Plan
qe pointed
out that the Budget Bireau ~epresentative cn the “lannin, Soard hac
expressed concern as *c tne validity of the -asua.t: “t.cires “tetaling 50,000,000) which were set forth in paragrap:. *
“wre OA of
Part I of the Plan.
“he 3t.ge* Member had pedintes ci" “iain i hese
sasualty figures were no’ s.ppocted or a curvernt ites
0
Tae Net
Evaluation Subcommitte«
The Preside: t again interrupted te gay “het
ing of the validity o°
she
casualty @igures
of getting into "a numbers same’.
coir question.
‘liustrete i the dangers
The President suggested that in-
gtead of over-a.] tas.ait. “igures, Plan D-Minus sheul: assume certain classification o «areer cf sssuaity and damace wee
word te
related to the target:
sategories of areas.
w.:
he ‘e,res of camage 9°
if:
“Fears
Mr. Cutler epwie.. ty stating that the 'Lanris., Soard hac
deemed the 50,000,00C casue.t}) 7liamre as reagonabie
o: the light of
past reports by the Net Pve..uatior Subcommittee
Me “Lanning Boar
further felt that some suct cver-412 casualty @Pieure: ~- necessar
for planning purposes
Pur exampie, one has te lpr cre amber
estimated availabie ..s;) “6
(‘teas Ha such caguglt: to
pees
'
Mr. Catier ‘mer c.agec oom Mr. Gray to epee. °
Snde ome ini
Mr. Gray replied that the Furea. ..f the Bucget was pro aanuy otgeht
Yo one could actuall. prove that cmder suck » surprose
cack we would have 50.90,"
wasualt‘es in
“he nite
some kind of estimate war evsenisl for the purposes
cleur et-
~
Fate:
~~
But
‘ederal
civil Defense Administratic: and ���heir rehabilitatic: sinandi: s.
Perhaps this sould be jen-, ag th President suggester.
>. terms of
areas related t targ ts within trem.
Since th»
ow
“Laure wa
not very useful. Mr. ora, s:ic that the pret oer o 1)
+
tar. ned
the light of the Pres gers”
suggestion.