correlation are secondary andare not quantified. Based onintensities depicted in Reference 2, the
H+1 Land
Intensity
D+1 Water
Intensity
(mR/hr)
Uncertainty
NAN
150
10.5
+50%
TARE
50
3.5
+20%
Location
Oo
ra
C7
following uncertainties in shine are estimated:
BRAVO
CHARLIE, DOG,
FOX, GEORGE
(R/hr)
70
35
+50%
HOW
1000
500
ROMEO
CHARLIE
1000
70
+80%
KOON
TARE
500
35
+50%
CHARLIE
+50%
0.5
30%
-DOG
50
3.5
+50%
FOX
100
7.0
+50%
GEORGE
120
8.4
+20%
25
1.75
450%
0.5
+50%
7.0
+30%
HOW
UNION
NAN
YANKEE
DOG,South of
100
FOX, GEORGE
200
14
HOW
150
10.5
+50%
NAN
100
7.0
+50%
FOX
1400
100
+100,-0%
+80%
For the exposures of each crew, the water intensities are taken to have systematic errors
by the stated amounts. Thus, the overall uncertainties in shine dose are calculated with all highsided and all low-sided intensities used in series for the upper and lowerlimits, respectively, of the
total shine dose.
84