NAME: HAP133080
-~
2090
reviewing
209%
standpoint,
2092
2093
Then
of radiation effects,
the
two
Over the
2095
13972,
2096
as
a
the
of these
years,
risk
result
2097
from the
89
genetic
and I with the Somatics Committee.
committees
and come to a consensus.
2094
he
PAGE
of
I would
to revise
last BEIR Committee
report ain
|
since
estimates
the
got together
the
have
recent
submit that
decreased
by
a
factor
of
two
reappraisal.
perhaps
the
EPA
and
other
groups
2098
looked at the radiation doses and potential consequences,
2099
maybe
2100
resettlement and clean-up,
2101
higher in risk.
2102
three,
So
2103
the
2104
lowe
four,
five,
they Might want
levels
than
they have
they
had
10
to
years
ago when they
planned the
were looking at a factor of two
reconsider
been able
to
the
achieve,
risks
associated with
which are much
anticipated.
The second thing is that the newest BEIR Committee,
2105
2106
reappraisal,
2107
model,
2108
from,
2109
risks;
2110
falls
271141
most consistent with radiobiological evidence.
2112
developed two models,
which is
the
that
one
all our
in its
one which is the linear
high-risk estimates
come
which was put forth as the upper limit on credible
and a
lower-risk model,
in between
So I
think
the high and
that was
the
the
called
linear
quadratic,
low models,
the
and
also is
best estimates.
2113
look
2714
estimates in terms of the numbers of added cancers
at
the
situation
fox
the
Enjebi
population,
which
the
I£
you
risk