NAME:
HAP 133080
1865
Mr.
PAGE
MITCHELL.
Excuse me.
80
The EPA has also said,
1866
somewhere in everybody's files,
the letters are there,
1867
numbers
millirem per
1868
30 years,
I mentioned
They have
1870
Mr.
and
1872
later.
1873
ask
to
be
YATES.
them.
I
We
different
1875
an
1876
back to Enjebi?
opinion as
1878
Dr.
WACHHOLZ.
1879
(Laughter. )
1880
Mr.
YATES.
judgment.
best
thing
in July.
but
to do is
this
I
don't know.
Do
is
bring
EPA in
a year
or
people
not
these
you want to express
would
you like
If I
had
an
to
express
option,
ought to go
an
opinion?
I would
Suppose you sat where Dr.
prefer not to.
Brill sits and Dr.
others.
WACHHOLZ.
May
I
comment on
some
of the
previous
testimony?
1884
Mr.
YATES.
1885
Dr.
WACHHOLZ.
Sure
you may.
We received a copy of their testimony
1886
during the lunch hour,
1887
look at it other than, superficial/}
1888
Just from what they said,
1889
5 ren in
You would rather not do it.
Wachholz,
Dr.
year,
Maybe the new EPA will come to a
to whether
Bender and the
the
that
conclusion.
Dr.
1883
think
did
1877
1882
applied with
We have anew EPA.
1874
1881
500
these
are not absolute ceilings.
1869
1871
before,
and
significant
so I have not had an opportunity to
disagreement
in
Glance through it.
I don't think we have any
terms
of
the
actual risk