NAME:
HAP 133080
PAGE
§5
1261
ago,
1262
perspective of a behavioral scientist, what effect it may
1263
have upon he people to keep them away from Enjebi.
1264
evaluation has
1265
the
1266
speak
1267
effects
to take
record,
a
look
YATES.
1269
Mr.
MITCHELL.
1270
effects,
1271
Mr.
YATES.
1272
Mr.
MITCHELL.
1274
1275
Mr.
badly,
very
feel
We
the
read
conelusion
The
are
are
There
them
report
says,
ill
potential
the
people
away?
ill
potential
away.
they want to go home?
very
They want
as
long
as
to
opportunity
the
from keeping
right.
si
His
Enjebi.
away from
are.
from the
a written report for
es
There
in keeping
That
tell us
to have
him
effects
There
and
to you
In other words,
YATES.
Brill.
and
No ill
health effects
They
this,
like
would
from keeping people
Mr.
home.
of
that question.
to
1268
1273
all
been provided
and we
briefly
at
they
cannot.
submitted
after
badly to go
stating
by Drs.
Bender
premises:
‘'We have reexamined our earlier Enewetak health effects
1276
1277
estimates
1278
coefficient estimates.
1279
note
1280
agreement
1281
is
1282
Enewetak
1283
to the southern Islands,
1284
will
1285
either
our
that
with
revised
those
entirely possible
people,
never
the
result
recent dose
more
the
in light of
and
cancer
risk
We
We find the risk is still small.
estimates
provided
the
that
resulting
remain in
by DOE.
We
remarkably good
still conclude
radiation exposures
from return
of
the
it
of the
dry Enewetak
and the dry Enjebi to their home,
in even a single
returning population.''
case
of
disease
among