... . . . .. .....
.._ . -.
.-
,,
Iron-!;5 Analyses
—.
IL-OIA-55 VJaS sc:paratecl and purified
solvent
extraction
Beaslcy,
1967) .
was
by X–ray
done
and el.ectrodeposition
Recoveries
generally
spectroscopy
with
conjunction
v;ith a multichannel
Bismuth-207
Analyses
The
solvent
were
used
used
as a yield
‘by
extraction
for separating
a
co.:~i-n”a~~~~l
techniques
exceeded
(Palmer
and
Counting
90%.
a proportional
Of
counter
in
analyzer.
techniques
of Sill
207Bi
and purifying
.
and Willis
(1965)
Bismuth-212
was
determinant.
Plu’coniurh-238, 239 Analyses
239 was
Plutonium-238,
extraction
1960;
the
a-nilanion
Kressin
final
determine
exchange
and Waterbury,
step
separated
in the
the corallire soils
1962),
nant
and that
Tritium
separation
counting
be done by
Pu be used
alpha
used
of plutonium
is exceptionally
that
was
as
to
from
difficult
as a yield
and
determi–
spectrometry.
Ailalvses
Well
liquid
essential
electrodeposition
Plutonium-236*
and sediments
of solvent
(YlcCowan and Larsen,
with
separation.
236
it is therefore
a combination
techniques
A quantitative
yield.
by
water
samples
scintillation
of 200 tritium
* Provided
were
measured
technique
with
for tritium
a minimum
content
level
by
a
of detection
units.
by the
USAEC
Health
and Safety
.Laboratory,
New York.