present at the time of exposure, who died 2 years after the accident, (2) a 78-year-old man who died, 3 years after exposure, of coronary heart disease complicating diabetes; and (3) a 36-year-old man who died ofacute varicella, 4 years after exposure, who had received only 69 r, having been radiation of the skin were seen in 12 cases which showed varying degrees of pigment aberrations, scarring, and atrophy at the site of the former burns. Numerous histopathological studies have been made,' '* and the changes found have been consistent with radiation damage. At no ume have on Ailingnae at the trme ofthe fallout. There was changes beén observed either grossly or microscopno apparent relauonship between any of these ically indicative of malignant or premalignant deaths and radiation exposufe, and mortality in changg. Spotty epikggson on the heads was short lived, regrowth of| “occurring about 3 months the exposed group did not appearto be gregter than in the unexposed population. after exposure and complete regrowth of normal It was difficult to evaluate the effects on fertility. hair by six months. No further evidence ofepilaHowever, a number of apparently normal babies _ tion has been seen. were born during the 4-yearperiod, and there hag** © An interesting observation was the appearance of a bluish-browa, pigthentation of the semilunar been no discernible fall in Gigah A stightlyv ateas of the fingernails and toenails in about WAY higher numberof miscarriages e¢c Pin theexof the people, beginning about 3 weeks after expo” posed women than in the ynexpose@ group; this sure. By 6 months, this pigmentauon had largely will be further evaluated in the present report. No grown out with the nail and had disappearedwaopacities of the lens or other eye changes have been found that could be related to radiation. most cases. The cause of this phenomenon halt: aq Studies on height, weightingbone age seemed beenplained, peet on ae B wane to show a slight degree of fgpamiie ean aEel 4 OF and development in the ex ee rc INTERNAL IRRADIATION ever, the small number of 2 ite ft tg a later finding that exact a : Radiochemical analyses of numerous urine dren were in doubt, has resufted in @ re-evaluation samples of the exposed population showedinternal of these data based on more reliable age deterabsorption of radioactive materials, probably minations. brought about largely through eating and drinkBETA IRRADIATION REE SKIN 2 SF It was impossible to get a urate estimate of the radiation dose to the skig. ta burns of the skin and epilation appeared:ittagpt 2 weeksafter exposure, largely on parts of by clothing, About 90% of burns, and a smaller num epilation of the scalp. ti@@ibdy not covered i g bas aes aD ihe ing contaminated food and water andto a lesser extent through inhalation. During the first few days when the body levels were at their highest, the maxffhugy permissible concentrations were ap= proached 9Faii Uiggicceded only in the case-of strontiug fie ii sotopesof iodine. Theo6- centrations ieved to be too low to result.ie any serious eff Rody ieveld fell rapidly, 830o that gand 3 e Mig superticial, they exhibited jij scaly desquamation, and * little pain. Rapid healing followed. Some lesions we desquamation, and were gin burns becamesecondarily SBeWed : after careropervdtaias considered treated with antibiotics. Re lesions gradually took place in most instanésys the skin appeared normal within a few wee. However, in about 15% of the people,= a lesions, particularly noted on the dors, feet, continued to show lack ofte pgaiiiiamigs with varying degrees of scarringar the skin. At + years the only residual effects ofbeta Mion, despite a per lowdevel of ftamesation) was reflected in a rise ‘burdensand increased urinary exMBionyclides. Beginning in vel. : aba! ysis! Fhig, along pof urine samples, 5 dens of cesium-137 b rontium-90 by a factor of{to” 20; and someincrease also in zinc-65, since the re-

Select target paragraph3