ee)
Dre Bugier ,

'

toe
a

:

‘

.:

:

Be
-

.

a

+

»

‘Septasber 16) 1954
-

a

co . eeo st+23
me
sine
-

.

.

a a

Hy analysis.of the ‘dmalation V8.; oral ingestionroutes:‘of uptake 5.

leads me to believe ingestion ismuch the more importants ~’ Hardia oie,

Jones, however, believes inhalationexplains his data better, If*:
_it is assumed,that’oral ingestion is dominant, one wouldexpéct *!
he

human activity,to be lower thangrazing animalst, (However, were.ee
milk {9 an important dietary component, available data on I trans- ©“; ~
mission through milk suggest that human thyroids would not be much.

lower in activity/gm than thecowst.) LeRoy's data probably give” .
only an upper limit to the average Anerican human thyroid activity; .”

the actual value is quite likely lowerbya sonsiderable Feotor.

My ‘calculations are based on LeRoy" 3.values."a

Tine Scale of 1-131 Ingestion

Fe

oe o

To extrapolate from observed activity.in uly, to “eseancted d
« ose t « a

of ingestion as a function of time. Preliminary data from lynch 2h
on fallout indicate.‘hat essentially all I-13] measuredin June. -

‘ \

te Tai

-

+ dp

Tae

and July originated fromthe May k shot. ‘otal falloutin the. >"
U. S. from CASTLE was about 3 times that from the Way shot, .
been tires, oe ose
that total] thyroid dose from CASTLE would have
such
bog dl sen
times that from the Kay h shots: Sayer

ow

from the fnll CASTLE series, an estinate must be made of quantity Lote

,
eeTa
a t att fallouta
- ed that
ed!
in the Oso
Inwy calcilat{ons Ihave assum

from the Hay h ‘shot occurred on Way 15, and that a continuous
ingestion of I-13] was thereafter maintained at a constant
are
of fissions per day.
~

" pISTRIBUTION: copyyA ~De. Bucher 3

ca- Biophysics Branch.

ab.

OFFICE >
SURNAME p>»
DATE
ARC-318

SOvrEn'
orice
1662761.
7
.
“D ebartment ofEnergy. nn
enen
te
nn eh

nisterian’s Cffice

Select target paragraph3