te bet

aes
oe.
tang}aayab MME oie GHB
cag eb ga ete
Ls miata. akephaient we SeuSt bereGBR
MM
i

E. T. LESSARD er ai.
Cs-t37

oT

5

~
-

7

q

a

E
q
=z

=

¢=

oto

e

~

a
4

RONGELAP MALES

_

rn

wen

Lat

_

>

oo

ue
a

_

—

>
a
=
a
o

=

_

-

-— sR
-~ Ye
wa
on
~_ _ &
el OF RR
~*~ TC ocd

_

_

a

¢

6 on > 888 —

—-

=

=

>

:

:

2
~

‘

‘

O

i

oR

o

2345

CO

hobo:

Lee ee

6rcf Nwre

a on on
1D

ec

oO

a

iw

FE
a
a
=

=
tad

¢
2
-

>

e

a

>
z=

‘
iot-

ee Oe

eo De Mae oe Wt

weno a a

“*
io3-

a

=e
mn

~ 'e°

oO

”

4107
x

“ya:
wm

os

\a

=
Ww

4102 2

oP
=

5

e

=

—_=

a wet aegee

-

ee

AONGELAP

-- ee + Zn-6F

a -

oT

ant &

a tee

_

a eee

3

an

POE

%

-

Bou

YS

an

.

-

x

@

ac

7

g-

10e -

@

310° E

i

-

eL

g

e316?

e

-

f o4e-

x

a

ic

Ww

a

4%
=
AIC sg
a

e

z
™

>

1045
a

_

-

>

-

*

—-—e8 Cs -t3

Fe
be BC
——— Sr 80

4

,

A

yee
ee
.
~

a
=

I

t

rote Fe Se

Wee

RONGELAP FEMALES

-

7c

§21

TIME

oF

PAST REHABITATION, goys

Fic. §. Body-purden historv for Rongelap adults.

-

6¢

-

AGE DURING 1957, yrs

Fic 4. Dailyactivity ingestion rate for day of return
to Rongelap Atoil.

=

_

daily fluid intake (Na80). Children and adolescents. however. were observed to receive a large
portion of their daily fluid intake from two

imported meals per day as part of the school

ao
~
eer ee
ae

'

a

~

ale
~e

aoe

=
=
=

-

oe
7

=

>
=
=

for infants. and then again (in a fermented
form! in adult life by males as a component of

“

7

“7

7“

~
Tom

—

z

awn

“7

~

27

~

ele

a
Ve

—

rn 7.
=

we

~

FE

e

=

ye
2:

=
=
xz

ceo}

ce
ee at

a

oD

-

ape

eee
nnn

TO
on
=
=
~

al

ge

a

=

es

=

ob

ne
LAS
Hoe

Taye S267 Bre,e TAT TN

ak

tt

na
.

Fic. 6. Bods-burden histors for Utrrk adults

lunch program. Studies indicated that coconuts

and coconut tree sap provided the major source
of “Cs in the diet (Le80a: Mi80). Thus. the
undulating shape of Fig. 4 reflected this vanation in the dietaryintake of '?’Cs-contaminated
foods.
Adult average values for activity ingestion

rate on day of return were calculated for all

nuclides. Results are listed in Table 4. This
information, together with the estimate of& for
the nuclide of interest. was used mm equation (2)
to estimate adu't body-burden histories based
on the assumption of declining continuous intake (see Figs. 5 and 6).
The declining continuous intake equation (3)

provided a smooth body-burden function for
Rongelap and Utirik adults. The equation was

a tool to provide retroactive body-burden estimates during the early years post-return to
Utirik. Few direct measurements were made at

this time. The data plotted in Fig. 6 for “Co and
“Fe were derived from Rongelap measurements.

Biological variation and errors in the col-

lection and analysis of urine samples introduced
larger errors in body-burden estimates than did
direct whole-body counting. These variations

can be observed in Fig. 5 where “Sr data vary

widely from the theoretical curve. In contrast.

the '’Cs data fit the curve closely.

The method used to generate Figs. 5 and 6
was not chosen to minimize the weighted sum of
squares of deviations of the body-burden estimates and measurements from thefitting function (equation (2)). Instead average values of k
and P° were selected to represent all the bodyburden data. For Rongelap, the '’Cs body
burdens varied from the fitted function by a

Select target paragraph3